User talk:Editorofthegods

April 2021
Hello, I'm Hemiauchenia. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hyperborea seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 11:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm AeschyIus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hyperborea—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. aeschyIus (talk) 23:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Agartha, you may be blocked from editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agartha. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Agartha. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * @tgeorgescu - why is this vandalism-only account not permanently banned yet? Tewdar (talk) 18:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't know. I am not an admin. tgeorgescu (talk) 06:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

May 21
Please read wp:vandal and wp:npa.Slatersteven (talk) 16:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Also wp:spa might be worth a read.Slatersteven (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 17:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and promotion
Your short block already expired. Since the above notices were all templates, I'll issue a personalized one: the encyclopedia has policies about extraordinary claims as well as about reliable sources and citing them (WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:FRINGE). It is also not for promoting specific views (WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:NOTFREESPEECH, WP:NOTWEBHOST). Adding unreliable websites and sources repeatedly can even result in their eventual blacklisting.There were two reasons for the previous block: edit warring (WP:BRD may be useful here and is valid for all editors; the talk page of each article is the place to attempt to seek consensus once reverted). Then accusing other editors who patrol the encyclopedia of being part of a conspiracy (WP:CIVIL, WP:ASPERSION). They are part of the community and If they are violating its own policies, they can be reported at an administrator noticeboard, instead of pushing conspiracy theories about them. Lastly, since you have created an account it is recommended to always edit with it in the future to avoid violating WP:SOCK. It also makes communication easier. Welcome back, — Paleo Neonate  – 21:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 21:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)