User talk:Editorsmeditor

August 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Leo Housakos, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ―NK1406 talk•contribs 16:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

The content added is more relevant to his political career. The content removed is outdated. Editorsmeditor (talk) 16:17, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * In your first edit made to the page you removed a great deal of content from the page, but in the edit summary you claimed you added content. Providing updated content is great, but widespread and unexplained removal of content is not. ―NK1406 talk•contribs 16:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. Am new to this. The content that was removed was false and outdated. The content that was removed made a totally false claim based on an article and an occurrence that has long since been updated to reflect the something different than what was being claimed.

In the first section, there was an extensive inquiry and when the report was released there was no mention of Housakos’ name, much less the claim that he was involved. And in the second section, there has also been a full investigation but neither Housakos or Plett were the subject of that investigation and that is made quite clear in the report from the investigator. Editorsmeditor (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Leo Housakos, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

The only thing my edits are disrupting is an attempt to disseminate untrue information. Are you interested in truth or in just smearing people. Both false accusations haven’t been updated in years and in both cases there have been full fledged investigations that show both claims to be completely false. Editorsmeditor (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Could you please give a source for the Charbonneau Commission's report? ―NK1406 talk•<b style="color:#0715b0">contribs</b> 17:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I see that you added a link, but I was unable to find the report. It appears that you listed a website but not a specific webpage. Where is the report from the link you provided? ―<b style="color:#0715b0">NK1406</b> <b style="color:#0715b0">talk</b>•<b style="color:#0715b0">contribs</b> —Preceding undated comment added 18:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

I will say that I find it odd that so much time and space is being given to an 8 year old insinuation that wasn’t testified to and certainly wasn’t born out. Now that the story played itself out so fully and this turned out to be a baseless allegation, why is it so important to continue to give it any credibility on this page? Is that normal for Wikipedia? Are these pages meant to inform people about the totality of a subject or are they an opportunity to smear people with baseless allegations that turn out to be false but then remain on these pages in perpetuity? Editorsmeditor (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Personally I care that all content on Wikipedia is as good as it possibly can be, and I care very much that everything is sourced reliably and as accurate as can be. Thank you for providing the report. I am also a relatively new editor, and though I have been searching relentlessly through any relevant policies I can find related to allegations where the subject has been declared innocent, I am unsure on how to continue. I think I may seek the assistance of a more experienced editor in how to continue. I apologize if I have come across as hostile, which is not my intention to be. ―<b style="color:#0715b0">NK1406</b> <b style="color:#0715b0">talk</b>•<b style="color:#0715b0">contribs</b> 02:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I wanted to let you know that I have placed a request for comment on the article so we can hear the opinions of more editors. ―<b style="color:#0715b0">NK1406</b> <b style="color:#0715b0">talk</b>•<b style="color:#0715b0">contribs</b> 02:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

I didn’t think you came across as hostile at all. I appreciated your questions and comments. Editorsmeditor (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Editorsmeditor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Leo Housakos, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Hipocrite (talk) 15:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)