User talk:EditorwTheBirthmark

Meta Vaux Warrick Fuller
Your wordsmithing of Meta Vaux Warrick Fuller is incredibly good. Unfortunately, though, you have messed up the content citing with nearly every edit. It's nice that you bring along the citations for the content that you are moving, but:
 * If you are adding it to content that is uncited, you need to add a cn tag - so that it doesn't look like the content came from the newly added source.
 * If you are taking part of the content away from a series of sentences, you need to ensure that you are leaving a citation tag for the content that remains. Otherwise it looks like it's uncited content (if there is no following text) - or - that it is cited with the following content's source. Both of are problem.
 * You are sometimes changing the meaning of content through the copy editing process. You need to ensure that if you are changing the meaning of the wording, that it's backed up by the cited source. If not, you need to add another source.

It's good to have you here, but some of the content has become so twisted that I have had to return what was originally in the article. I am still not sure I have caught all the issues, but I'll keep picking at it.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I am betting that it is not clear, I truly hope you stay and edit (maybe create) more articles... and please let me know if you have an issue with any of the guidelines.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for your edits, really great!!!! I was hoping that you might come back and wordsmith the additions.


 * Just as a reminder to watch citations, I added citations here for edits you made specific to the Warricks that were mixed in with the Philadelphia background info. It's a bit confusing to start to manage citations. I am happy to help. There are also helpful tutorials... and resources, like WP:Teahouse. See also Citation.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)