User talk:Editwriter98

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 23:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:30, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Susan Branch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   16:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Susan Branch
Congratulations on the new article! I have removed the entries in the external links list that have already been used as references. The ones that do not legitimately belong in the External links list (See WP:EL and WP:ELNO) but could still be used as sources to expand and improve the article I moved to Talk:Susan Branch. I've also done a few minor technical tweaks to the article. Roger (talk) 17:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the efforts. It's funny I added all those external links because I was told I needed more sourcing! So if I add info from those sources and reference the lines, will that work? And my biggest concern is that I started out with a bigger article and was told to make it less. So I am wondering what kind of info can I include to make it better that will not make it less of an encyclopedia entry? I just do not know what is acceptable to include, but, of course, want to make it as good as I possibly can. Many thanks!


 * The article currently has nothing about her education, personal life (marriage, does she have children, etc). What do critics and commentators say about her work? Some basic info about her writing would also help - what genre(s) are her books - crime thrillers or cookbooks? Assume that your reader has never heard of her (true in my case). Roger (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks - that is exactly what I needed to know. I appreciate it! Editwriter98 (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)