User talk:Edmund6795

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 10:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of "Ciria Ltd"
A page you created, Ciria Ltd, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 10:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ciria (2)
A tag has been placed on Ciria (2), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 10:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CIRIA logo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:CIRIA logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

CIRIA research
A tag has been placed on CIRIA research, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 11:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with CIRIA
Hello. Concerning your contribution, CIRIA, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, CIRIA appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. CIRIA has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:CIRIA and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:CIRIA with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:CIRIA.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to File:CIRIA logo.JPG has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

A little late
Sorry, I didn't notice your message on my talk page. Normally, we add new entries to the bottom of the page rather than the top. Anyhow, I see that you already have the permission archived and the page has been restored. If you have any questions or if there is anything that I can do to help you, feel free to ask. Have a good evening. Trusilver 04:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CIRIA logo.JPG)
 Thanks for uploading Image:CIRIA logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ecoigo


The article Ecoigo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of WP:notability. Despite appearing to have lots of references further investigation reveals that only 2 actually mention the company and one of those is a directory listing. Claims to being largest green cab company not backed up - the reference given to the companies own website is to a non existent page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Removing Bias from Article)
Hello Wiki Admins, my Ecoigo article wasn't up to scratch and would probably have been removed soon so I requested deletion from Malik Shabazz. The notability references bit is easy to remedy- it was always going to be a work in progress to add verified independent sources for the subject itself and it's my fault for being lazy/ rushing. But how can I remove the bias- just be really neutral and subjective? I'm naturally an emotive writer so that will be a bit of a challenge for me! I'm going to experiment with neutrality in my sandbox here [] so I'd appreciate it if you could highlight or even outright delete the biased/ promotional parts of the article so I can repeal the G11 breach. Many Thanks. Edmund6795 (talk) 10:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC) Edmund6795 (talk) 10:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll assume you have a conflict of interest, because it seems very likely. So,


 * 1) Don't write about it; write about something else. Per WP:COI, WP:BFAQ, WP:BESTCOI.
 * 2) When you ignore the above advice, please edit some other articles first - to learn about Wikipedia, and avoid being labelled a single-purpose account.
 * 3) When you ignore that too, stick to verifiable facts from reliable sources, and keep a neutral point-of-view; so, don't write 'corporate-speak' promotional things like Ecoigo offer a 24 hour, year-round executive service. If you can be bothered, read WP:FIRST, WP:NPOV.  Chzz  ► 21:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)