User talk:Edmundoe

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. - Mark 02:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

ABC on soccer
Hi, please read and apply the policies contained in he following link. WP:RS Continuing to edit without providing sources that meet WP criteria will be seen as disruption. If you wish to dicuss this further pls leave a message on my talk page. SmithBlue (talk) 10:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. SatuSuro 07:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add poorly sourced and opinionated content to articles on Wikipedia, as you have done to Australian Broadcasting Corporation. All content on Wikipedia must be verifiable by reliable sources, and must also adhere to a neutral point of view. Further edits of this nature will be considered vandalism, and may result in your being blocked. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

your tripod page is not RS
Hi, please read WP:RS and WP:OR. The source you give for the material you have added http://edmundoe.tripod.com/index.htm> - is not an RS because there "is no fact-checking process and no guarantee of quality of reliability". And therefore the material added is OR. And Wikipedia does not publish original research: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

If you do not understand why your posts are a problem please go to the [New contributors' help page] and get some-one to explain it to you.

Continuing to insert WP:OR material can be see as disruptive editing and can result in a block for the editor involved. SmithBlue (talk) 07:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Australian Broadcasting Corporation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 11:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC) in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. To allow you the time to read the various pages suggested above I have blocked you for 31 hours. If you have already read the policy pages, etc., that clarifies that only verifiable (from good independent sources) content should be added to articles then I suggest that you use the unblock option above, advising the reviewing admin that you now understand the policies. If, however, you simply return to inserting your personal views into articles upon expiry of the block I would suggest that the next block will be considerably longer. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Jan 2009
Your Talk page already carries discussions on why adding links to what appears to be a webpage you own is not a good idea. Please do not do this again. --HighKing (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)