User talk:Edoizzi

Exocious
The word Exocious has no English dictionary meaning... Edo Izzi during a "ReConnect" retreat session used the word to describe himself and the life he longed to live. '''Exocious ...... (God's perfect will, manifested in me...)''' To have an understanding of what the word Exocious means to Edo Izzi, you have to understand Love. To understand love is to refer back to the creator of Love and the principles that govern life and the bible puts it best. 1 Corinthians 13:3-10 (New Living Translation)

''3 If I gave everything I have to the poor and even sacrificed my body, I could boast about it; but if I didn’t love others, I would have gained nothing. 4 Love is patient and kind. Love is not jealous or boastful or proud 5 or rude. It does not demand its own way. It is not irritable, and it keeps no record of being wronged. 6 It does not rejoice about injustice but rejoices whenever the truth wins out. 7 Love never gives up, never loses faith, is always hopeful, and endures through every circumstance. 8 Prophecy and speaking in unknown languages and special knowledge will become useless. But love will last forever! 9 Now our knowledge is partial and incomplete, and even the gift of prophecy reveals only part of the whole picture! 10 But when full understanding comes, these partial things will become useless.''

'''And to sum it all up living an Exocious life is what is known as living a fulfilled life and how can you quantify living a fulfilled life? Simply by obeying the two commandments that drive the bible as a whole:'''

Mark 12:30-31 (New King James Version)

30 And you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength. This is the first commandment. 31 And the second, like it, is this: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.”

Live Exociously

Edoizzi (talk) 11:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Exocious
A tag has been placed on Exocious, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 12:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Exocious


The article Exocious has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * this is an unsourced neologism and Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * To understand why your article about your new word is not acceptable, click the links in the notice above, and read WP:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Exocious
I have nominated Exocious, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Exocious. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MuffledThud (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)