User talk:Edpe77/Gender neutrality in languages with grammatical gender/HUSR320 Peer Review

Peer Review
Hi.

I am not sure if you are able to see my Peer Review or if I did it correctly on the user page. However, I will place it on here as well as an extra safety measure. Great job on your edits, you went above and beyond.

The first paragraph of the overview that was entirely rephrased was done well. The original wording was not as clear and concise as it is now with the changes made to the article. Additional information was added using the cited sources to better reflect what the article will be discussing as well as give an in-depth overview as opposed to the original paragraph which was lacking citations for its sources.

However, it may be that large portions of the article were directly copied to the sandbox which may pose a problem per the wikipedia rules. The minor grammatical corrections made allow for an easier reading and removed the confusion the original text was causing. Edpe77 followed instructions regarding edit summaries and provided specific information on what edits were done as well as providing a reason for them. Overall, Edpe77 found issues with the original article that may have been difficult to spot and or which would have posed to be a challenge when making corrections. HUSR320 (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)