User talk:Edpendrag

April 2017
Hello, I'm Quasar G.. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tagged have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Quasar G  t - c 20:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Edpendrag/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:10, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...

If Wikipedia does not accept valid information, and continues to use outdated or invalid information, then what is the point of Wikipedia? And would you like this remark to be made public? You ask for contribution but then disregard the information? Why waste my time? Edpendrag (talk) 01:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey Ed! Your article submission looked like a complaint about a company. This would be a matter to take up with them. Please also take a look at WP:NOT. Thanks!  Programming Geek talk to me 02:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Information that is in our articles must be backed up by independent, published, reliable sources. Your personal experiences with a company are original research and are not valid on Wikipedia. I'm sorry but our policy on material inclusion requires a reliable sources so that other readers can verify that information. The edit you made to Tagged was also in the middle of a reference which broke the syntax and made the URL unusable. If you wish to learn more about how Wikipedia works I invite you to take a look at our welcome page. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Majora (talk) 02:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Edpendrag/sandbox


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, User:Edpendrag/sandbox, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 12:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)