User talk:Edson Frainlar

Speedy deletion nomination of DMI College of Engineering


A tag has been placed on DMI College of Engineering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://mechnol.blogspot.fr/2010/03/dmi-college-of-engineering.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Domdeparis (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I see that at Talk:DMI College of Engineering you wrote that the article should not be deleted "because.. this is a true article about DMI College of Engineering. You can verify it." However, if you had read the messages about the deletion proposal, both on this page and on the article, you would have seen that the reason for deletion was copyright infringement, not untruthfulness or unverifiability.
 * Apart from the copyright issue, there is another reason why the article was unsuitable for Wikipedia, namely that it was purely promotional. A Wikipedia article must be written from a neutral point of view, and should not say, for example, that its subject is "prestigious", that its surroundings are "salubrious", that the managers have a "clear vision", and so on. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rev. Fr. Dr. J.E. Arulraj


A tag has been placed on Rev. Fr. Dr. J.E. Arulraj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WNYY98 (talk) 15:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rev. Fr. Dr. J.E. Arulraj


The article Rev. Fr. Dr. J.E. Arulraj has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Nthep (talk) 15:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DMI Foundations Trust


A tag has been placed on DMI Foundations Trust, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at DMI Foundations Trust, you may be blocked from editing. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at DMI Foundations Trust. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at DMI Foundations Trust. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DMI Foundations Trust


A tag has been placed on DMI Foundations Trust, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Removing Speedy Deletion Tag
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of J. E. Arulraj for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. E. Arulraj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/J. E. Arulraj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Neil N  talk to me 19:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sisters of Daughters of Mary Immaculate and Collaborators


The article Sisters of Daughters of Mary Immaculate and Collaborators has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Completely unsourced, wildly promotional, unrescuable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen &#124; talk 22:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fathers of Missionaries of Mary Immaculate


The article Fathers of Missionaries of Mary Immaculate has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Sourced to the society's own material only, with no indication of notability, and wildly promotional.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen &#124; talk 22:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Don't get into my nerves by continuously saying such filthy reasons. I have given all type of references available in internet. Moreover as a proof of religious congregation, i have included the reference from www.indiancathokiconline.com. Please view all the references carefully. Don't come and complaint without proper observation. Change your attitude. If you are perfect, let those skills rest with you. You don't pinpoint others like a senseless creature. Edson Frainlar (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

I have moved your post
Hi, Edson Frainlar. You posted an argument at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/J. E. Arulraj. It should be at Articles for deletion/J. E. Arulraj, without the "talk", because these project pages are discussions in themselves – you don't have to go to the talkpage to discuss, in fact nobody would notice your post on the talkpage. I have moved it to the right page. Bishonen &#124; talk 22:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC).

Please stop harassing users
Please stop harassing and attacking everybody who speaks about your articles or tries to talk with you, as you did here, here, here, and here (the last is a whole dialogue, very aggressive on your side). They are experienced users trying to help by advising you about Wikipedia's policies, and all they get in return from you is abuse. Wikipedia is a place where people are supposed to be able to discuss articles without being attacked. Stop it or you may be blocked from editing. Bishonen &#124; talk 16:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC).

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

I quit
I am a new writer in wikipedia. For all articles immediately it is placed under speedy deletion list. No one is saying the reason for proposing the article to get deleted. Really I was disappointed. Whatever I do, (i don't want to mention their name) they will be there to discourage me by repeatedly saying to delete. No time will be given for changing the errors in that article. From all my experience, i realized that Wikipedia is not a good place for emerging or budding article writers. I have decided to get out of wikipedia. Sorry for any inconvenience caused by me. Finally, i say that this is not a healthy place for new writers. Edson Frainlar (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It's fine for new writers who realize this is an encyclopedia and not a place to promote people/organizations. If you try writing about subjects you don't have a personal relationship with you'll probably get a different reception. --Neil N  talk to me 14:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 15:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

''All right, that's enough. You keep saying you quit, but apparently that doesn't mean you'll quit harassing people and impugning their good faith. Bishonen &#124; talk 15:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC).''

Sockpuppet
Edson, I see you have created a new account, User:Edson Frainlar I, and continued to edit DMI College of Engineering and related articles. You're not allowed to evade your block by creating a new account; your block applies to the person — you personally — not just to the account. I have blocked your sockpuppet account, since it's merely you over again, and you are blocked from editing Wikipedia. Instead of creating new accounts, you're supposed to request unblock of this account, according to the instructions in the pink box above. Bishonen &#124; talk 01:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC). --UTRSBot (talk) 19:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  07:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DMI College of Engineering


The article DMI College of Engineering has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BhaskaraPattelar (talk) 09:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)