User talk:Edu.2022.wiki

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Periodické hodnotenie výskumnej, vývojovej, umeleckej a ďalšej tvorivej činnosti (March 30) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Periodické hodnotenie výskumnej, vývojovej, umeleckej a ďalšej tvorivej činnosti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Periodick%C3%A9_hodnotenie_v%C3%BDskumnej,_v%C3%BDvojovej,_umeleckej_a_%C4%8Fal%C5%A1ej_tvorivej_%C4%8Dinnosti Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Periodick%C3%A9_hodnotenie_v%C3%BDskumnej,_v%C3%BDvojovej,_umeleckej_a_%C4%8Fal%C5%A1ej_tvorivej_%C4%8Dinnosti reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Edu.2022.wiki! Your additions to Draft:Periodické hodnotenie výskumnej, vývojovej, umeleckej a ďalšej tvorivej činnosti have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Periodické hodnotenie výskumnej, vývojovej, umeleckej a ďalšej tvorivej činnosti
Hello, Edu.2022.wiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Periodické hodnotenie výskumnej, vývojovej, umeleckej a ďalšej tvorivej činnosti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Periodické hodnotenie výskumnej, vývojovej, umeleckej a ďalšej tvorivej činnosti


Hello, Edu.2022.wiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Periodické hodnotenie výskumnej".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Periodic Evaluation of Research, Development, Artistic and Other Creative Activities (November 3) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Periodic Evaluation of Research, Development, Artistic and Other Creative Activities and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Periodic_Evaluation_of_Research,_Development,_Artistic_and_Other_Creative_Activities Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Periodic_Evaluation_of_Research,_Development,_Artistic_and_Other_Creative_Activities reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
You declared a conflict of interest, what is the general nature of it? 331dot (talk) 12:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry - I am not aware of declaring any conflict of interest. Could you please elaborate more on what you mean? 194.160.76.124 (talk) 12:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming that you are this user, remember to log in when posting. You posted a conflict of interest declaration on your user page(User:Edu.2022.wiki). 331dot (talk) 12:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, yes, you are correct - because the page is about the periodic evaluation of science in Slovakia and I am a member of the team working at the backoffice for this periodic evaluation (organised by the ministry of education). We need to publish this website/article in English as we want potential evaluators from universities all around the world to be able to get some more information about our evaluation. Could you please advise me how to proceed? I'll be very grateful. Edu.2022.wiki (talk) 12:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Based on what you say here, you seem to meet the definition of a paid editor and as such the Terms of Use require you to make a formal paid editing disclosure, see WP:PAID for instructions(this can replace the COI disclosure).
 * If as you say, you have no further reliable sources that discuss this topic, it will not merit an English Wikipedia article at this time- even if it does on the Slovak Wikipedia which(as I said elsewhere) is a separate project. I apologize for being frank with you- but Wikipedia is not concerned with helping spread the word about your evaluation, that is a promotional purpose and not permitted on the English Wikipedia. If this article is acceptable on the Slovak Wikipedia, I suggest that you focus your efforts there and encourage interested people to read it with Google Translate or similar. 331dot (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. The purpose is, however, not promotional per se. We would like to do the same as REF did - please see here: Research Excellence Framework - Could you please explain to me in what ways it is different? Edu.2022.wiki (talk) 13:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Our articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the topic. I see nothing to indicate that article was written by editors with a conflict of interest- if it were and they failed to disclose it, that violates policy- even more so if they were paid editors and failed to disclose it. You will need to make the paid disclosure yourself as indicated.
 * That article is much better sourced and its primary intention is to summarize those sources- any other benefit is on the side. I respectfully disagree with you- you said "we want potential evaluators from universities all around the world to be able to get some more information about our evaluation"- that's promoting your evaluation.  The place to provide information about your evaluation is on your own website, or if acceptable on the Slovak Wikipedia, there. I (and the community) can only tell you what our policies are and what our expectations are. 331dot (talk) 13:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Periodic Evaluation of Research, Development, Artistic and Other Creative Activities
Hello, Edu.2022.wiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Periodic Evaluation of Research, Development, Artistic and Other Creative Activities, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)