User talk:EducationOasis

Welcome
 Hello, EducationOasis, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

EducationOasis, good luck, and have fun. – S Philbrick  (Talk)  13:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Issues with American School of Marrakesh
Unfortunately, there are major problems with your edits to American School of Marrakesh. There are too many to address on a case-by-case basis so I am reverting the article to an earlier version and encourage you to start over (If you do not have a conflict of interest) with edits, doing so slowly so that experienced editors can help confirm whether they are appropriate.

The first issue is whether you are employed or closely associated with the organization. That appears to be the case. If so you need to read the conflict of interest policy: Conflict of interest. In particular please pay attention to the declaring an interest section.

I'll mention a couple of the problems with the article.

We take copyright very seriously. It is not acceptable to copy and paste material from a source even if referenced. It is acceptable to use relatively short quotes if the material is included in quotes. We can also discuss issues such as the mission statement which by definition should not be paraphrased and might be longer than typical quotes.

I see that you are including references which is good but we almost never include references in a section heading.

It is great that you included some photos, but the size you used is far too large. There are some rare examples where a very wide photo may be appropriate, such as a stunning panorama, but the side you used is a multiple of what is generally appropriate.

I see that you included a logo and have arranged for a free license. While this is acceptable, it is quite rare for an organization to be willing to give up control over the logo. In most cases, logos are incorporated under a fair use provision. If it truly is the case that the organization is willing to give up control of its logo, that's fine, but we will want a clear permission statement from an official with the authority to make that decision.

I don't know whether this is a complete list — it's just a few items I noticed while checking for a copyright issue.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)