User talk:Educator1952

Proposed deletion of Elite Home Tutoring
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Elite Home Tutoring, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No indication of notability - article lacks external sources, and is written in parts as an advertisement. Would need significant rewrite and also verifiable citations to meet the notability requirements for a company (WP:CORP)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Flying  Toaster  10:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Elite home tutoring
A tag has been placed on Elite home tutoring, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Elite home tutoring and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 17:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 17:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

If you want to communicate with another wikipedia user, leave a polite message on their talk page. Don't create an article criticizing their behavior. Jon513 (talk) 18:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, if you want to hang out, or say hi, you should leave a message on my talk page or leave a message on yours, not create another article.  Tell me what do you need to contribute productively to Wikipedia and I will do my best to make it happen.  If you aren't interested in making wikipedia better, can you please stop wasting our time.  (You can respond here).  Jon513 (talk) 18:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Elite Home Tutoring Ohnoitsjamie
A tag has been placed on Elite Home Tutoring Ohnoitsjamie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tckma (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Given the page creations listed, and their content, I've gone ahead and blocked you indefinitely. Cheers, Wily D 18:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)