User talk:Edupedro

Thanks to all the people who contribute to Wikipedia!!

Let's do it better and better!!

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikiloc


A tag has been placed on Wikiloc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jersey92 (talk) 15:04, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Please see comment on the talk page. --Jersey92 (talk) 20:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Please have a look to my last comment on the talk page. Regards, Edupedro (talk) 13:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see the talk page. --Jersey92 (talk) 13:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * New comment in the talk page, Edupedro (talk) 14:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Commented. --Jersey92 (talk) 16:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
I changed from Speedy to PROD. That will give you a chance to fix this if possible, which I am not sure it can be based on a Google search.

Proposed deletion of Wikiloc


The article Wikiloc has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG. Lacks WP:RS. Claim of number of users etc. and anything resembling notability are from its own website not from WP:RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jersey92 (talk) 17:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Article improved, with more links to external independent pages that tell about the history and importance of Wikiloc. Edupedro (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Women in Development Europe


The article Women in Development Europe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)