User talk:Edward Boginsky

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Edward Boginsky/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Edward_Boginsky/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Edward_Boginsky/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Edward Boginsky/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Edward Boginsky/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CNMall41 (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024


Hello, Edward Boginsky. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created User:Edward Boginsky/sandbox has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject  and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Common sourcing mistakes (notability). The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.   Persistent posters of promotional content may be blocked from editing.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is  here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, and on IRC chat. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * Thank you for your message. I just wanted to clarify that all the information on my account is 100% true. I followed the guidelines and was contacted by an awards archives who suggested adding myself to your website since I have been a known Fine Art Printer before the internet even existed.
 * I do not seek fame, but I was advised to do so. If my account is deleted as mentioned, many people in the Fashion Fine Art industry may not recognize who I am or where I am based, based on the look books I have published and printed.
 * Thank you for your understanding.
 * Best,
 * Edward Boginsky Edward Boginsky (talk) 02:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Please reread the deletion notice and links therein. &#45;-  Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comment. But based on negative comments, I will close my account and will not post
 * any of my work.
 * Thank you
 * Edward Edward Boginsky (talk) 02:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Accounts cannot be 'closed' but you can abandon it. Sorry this did not work out. Attempts at autobiography, especially by new editors, invariably fail because the people do not understand Wikipedia rules for neutral point of view and reliable references to verify all facts. David notMD (talk) 11:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)