User talk:Edward przydzial

Welcome!

Hello, Edward przydzial, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! szyslak 09:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please don't move this page to article space
Why did you move this user talk page to article space? From your edit summary, I gather that you thought you were fixing a spelling error. The "User talk:" in the title of this page is not an error. My talk page has that too: User talk:Szyslak. It's there to show that it's a user talk page, and not an article or other type of page. For more information, see Namespace. szyslak 06:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Edits to article Corrupt (band)
I see that you made various changes to the article Corrupt (band) because you thought information in the article was inaccurate. For your information, the article's talk page, not the article itself, is the place for discussion about accuracy. However, you should feel free to delete any information that cannot be verified by reference to a reliable source, as I have done in my recent edit to the article. --Russ (talk) 13:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Your edits altered the format and added unsourced information. Please address this issues before editing.'' - RUL3R *trolling *vandalism 16:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - RUL3R *trolling *vandalism 17:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - RUL3R *trolling *vandalism 17:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Closedmouth (talk) 17:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Page Edited: Barack Obama "joker" posterThomas LbB 18:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Barack Obama "Joker" poster, you will be blocked from editing.  APK  because, he says, it's true  23:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I started a discussion here regarding your edits.  APK  because, he says, it's true  23:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. You are claiming Copyright or ownership of an image that is the subject of a Wikipedia article. You, or your legal representatives, should contact the Wikimedia Foundation substantiating your claim. However, in the meantime, you are not permitted to edit the encyclopedia, in an effort to minimize the disruption made by your claims. Legal threats are not permitted on this site. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Help me!
I am confused how this works and would like to use my page. can you assist?

Please help me with...

edwardprzydzial.com (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2017 (UTC)


 * You were blocked for repeatedly blanking an article. Above you can find advice on how to proceed if you believe Wikipedia is misusing your content and/or want to pursue legal means. If you no longer believe so, you are of course welcome to retract your legal threats and to request to be unblocked; above you will also find information on how to do that. For a general introduction to Wikipedia, see Introduction. Huon (talk) 08:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Edwardprzydzial.jpg


The file File:Edwardprzydzial.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)