User talk:Edwoll77

June 2018
Hello, I'm NewEnglandYankee. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Hanley Ramírez, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. A citation consisting of nothing but the words "WEEI Sports radio" isn't nearly strong enough for defamatory content such as this. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 02:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:NewEnglandYankee. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As NewEnglandYankee has already told you, allegations of criminal activity need clear and specific sourcing, not vague mentions of a radio show. Please read the biographies of living persons policy, and please stop attacking editors who enforce that policy.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Did you even bother to read my message ?
There would have been no point in attacking the editor had the editor done his job in the 1st place. Read my entire message! If you don't get it, then maybe you're just not that intelligent either. I don't willy nilly go changing and editing Wikipedia pages. It's the second time I've done it in my entire life. I'm 57 years old. I have better things to do that to slander someone's reputation on the page. I provided the additional citing detail, and your fellow geek still refused used to publish it. He did it out of spite because his little feelings were hurt. I can't even believe that I'm having this conversation with you geeks. Cut me off from the damn editing I don't really give a s***


 * Something you heard on the radio isn't an acceptable reference for an allegation of criminal activity in print. Source it to a verifiable published source, preferably more than one, or don't make the edit. Wikipedia doesn't print gossip from talk shows. If you make any more personal attacks of the kind on display above, you will be blocked from editing. Follow policy or don't make such edits. I'm 59, so your age isn't an excuse.   Acroterion   (talk)   04:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm done with you don't send me anymore damn message rebuttals.
Go keep yourself busy watching your Big Bang Theory and Young Sheldon reruns. Or dive into a comic book. Or better yet get ready for your next Star Trek convention But I've had enough of this s*** You don't get it. And I'm not wasting anymore of my time.

June 2018
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * If you want to edit Wikipedia you are expected to live by our rules. For what it's worth, reports that someone might be being investigated aren't usually considered until there's some serious chance that charges will be filed. For now, please reconsider your approach to editing Wikipedia and to your behavior toward other editors - this is a collaborative venture to write an encyclopedia, not a name-calling competition.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)