User talk:Edwtie

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Perfecto 01:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Template:CompactTOC8
As you have edited this template significantly, you may be interested in this TfD, one way or another. —  SMcCandlish  &#91;talk&#93; &#91;cont&#93; ‹(-¿-)› 10:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks you for comment. I have now read about new template. I will implement new template to NL of wikipedia at later. Edwtie (talk) 00:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

See more talking (only dutch): nl:overleg_gebruiker:Edwtie

File copyright problem with File:Leidse kaas.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Leidse kaas.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Hydrogen atom pic: diameter too large
The Bohr radius (about 0.53Ångström) would give a diameter of about 1.06 Ångström. The given diamber of 2.4 Ångström is far too large. Even the ionic radius is only 0.3 Ångström. The diameter should be changed to either 1.06 Ångström or (to two sig figures) 1.1 Ångström. Thanks! S B Harris 20:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Hydrogen_atom.svg

Element category colors
Saying any of those elements are in specific element categories is original research and was therefore changed back to indicate what we do know; that there is not enough of those elements to determine what element category they belong in. --mav (reviews needed) 00:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Results of my research on Kintetsubuffalo's talk page. Naraht (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Found a reference for the Motto.
Unlock a New World at http://www.vcp.de/fileadmin/grafiken_vcp/bundesleitung/Bundesebene_aktuell/Bundesleitung/2011/BL_aktuell_WSC_2011.pdf Naraht (talk) 16:04, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=591856772 your edit] to Robert Enke may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * bild.de | date = 10 November 2009 | accessdate =10 November 2009 | language = German}}  http://www.mh-hannover.de/46.html?&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5BpS%5D=1257008826&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=

File source problem with File:20th World Scout Jamboree.png
Thank you for uploading File:20th World Scout Jamboree.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 05:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 18th World Scout Jamboree
 * added links pointing to Phoenix, Aquarius, Leo, Aries and Lyria


 * 23rd World Scout Jamboree
 * added links pointing to Akagi, Ena and Chokai

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * On the 2016 Summer Olympics page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=757461473 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F757461473%7C2016 Summer Olympics%5D%5D Ask for help])

Original research
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Cochlear implant. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I am expert of Cochlear implant. Don't use editing war. It's NO research but it's facts of cochleair implants. 19:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning
If you restore the content, I will bring you to EWN and you will be blocked or the article will be locked. You cannot force content into WP, especially when it violates fundamental policies.

Your recent editing history at Cochlear implant shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 19:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 19:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

WP:USERNAME issue
Per the policy WP:USERNAME, only one person can use an account. In your comments here and here you refer to multiple people. Please clarify whether one person or multiple people are using this account. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * STop attrack to me! Edwtie (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You have a kind of reply here. If you are one person, please refer to yourself in the singular.  You cannot speak for a group, also per the USERNAME policy -see WP:ISU.  If you continue to refer to yourself as "we" you will be blocked under the USERNAME policy.   You will do as you will. Jytdog (talk) 20:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Deleted this. I know. but you need patient please!

Edit warring at Cochlear implant
You've been warned per the outcome of a report at the edit warring noticeboard. Further reverting or further addition of copyrighted content may lead to a block of your account. If you wait until consensus is found on the talk page you should have no problem. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * it's no copyrighted content but it has content without sources. But it has many good items from old versions of content of cochlear implants. They don't understand why. Edwtie (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Talk page archives
See here - archiving is entirely normal. If you want to comment on some old talk section, just link to it in a new comment - here is an example of such a link. Please stop cluttering up the talk page with old discussions. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 21:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * you will see how I do.. Edwtie (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2020 Netherlands coronavirus lockdown


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2020 Netherlands coronavirus lockdown. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Netherlands. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Netherlands. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Capewearer (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Photo request
I noticed that in the archive of the talkpage for the article about the Cochlear implant you mentioned that you had one. Can you please take some pictures of the speech processor device on a white background, and while being worn for Wikimedia Commons? Most of the current photos of devices on Commons are not very good (grainy, low resolution, taken from wrong angle, etc). If you have any older/previous generation devices can you take and upload pictures of those too? Thank you!--RespectCE (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I will made new photo's of new generations of cochlear implants again. Edwtie (talk) 21:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Let me know when you upload them to Commons.--RespectCE (talk) 12:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * By the way, I just made a userbox for you:

Hope you like it!--RespectCE (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)