User talk:Edwyth

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.I am Earlymen, I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Earlymen  message me!  01:02, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

The X Factor (Australia season 8)
The page has an in use tag it, please respect that and do not edit it to avoid edit conflicts with other users.  Ss 112  09:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * And "dude", I already asked you not to edit the page while there's in an use tag on it. It doesn't matter if you think somebody else is wrong, stop editing while it's tagged or you'll be warned and potentially reported for disregarding warnings.  Ss 112  09:49, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I apologize for editing while "in use," but to be clear I wasn't vandalizing the page and if you look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X_Factor_(UK_series_12)#Week_1_.2831_October.2F1_November.29 there is precedents for my edits. Edwyth (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't say you were vandalising. Also yes, I've seen the UK series' examples now.  Ss 112  10:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * On the List of most streamed songs on Spotify page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=765587558 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F765587558%7CList of most streamed songs on Spotify%5D%5D Ask for help])

Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Qualification moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Qualification, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:28, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Qualification has been accepted
 Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Qualification, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Naraht (talk) 20:51, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Curling_at_the_2022_Winter_Olympics_%E2%80%93_Qualification help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Qualification for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Qualification is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Qualification until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

2020 World Men's Curling Championship moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2020 World Men's Curling Championship, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  00:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Dear Discospinster, you claim this reference https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/media.worldcurling.org/media.worldcurling.org/wcf_worldcurling/2019/09/17100941/2019-The-Rules-of-Curling-_Changelog.pdf has nothing to do with the championships, but if you look on page 55 and 56 it outlines how the teams qualify for the World's Men's and Women's Curling Championships. I appreciate your due diligence as a great wikipedia editor, but I think the two pages I had for the 2020 World Men's Curling Championship and 2020 World Women's Curling Championship should be reverted back to full page status. Edwyth (talk) 05:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The document gives general rules of eligibility, it does not support the list of qualifying countries that was in the section. There needs to be more references to show that these teams qualified. ... disco spinster   talk  13:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I am a little confused. The teams that have qualified are based on their rank at the appropriate world events. Such as the European Curling Championship. If the Top 7 teams from that championship qualify for the World Men's Curling Championship and such teams are proven to have come in the top 7, doesn't that mean they have qualified based on the rules in the document? Edwyth (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It absolutely supports the list of qualified countries as you indicate Edwyth, more sources would be good, but moving this to draft space was silly. Tomorrow I will add several sources and put it back into mainspace.  WP:BEFORE was not done here and it is not up to user discospinster whether it should be a draft or not.18abruce (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * None of the qualifying countries were named in the document, it was a general description of qualifying rules. If an article does not have supporting citations it may be moved to draft, no discussion needed. You are welcome to add sources before it's moved to mainspace. ... disco spinster   talk  01:41, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * From the individual who did not understand the material in the first place, LOL. An Olympic sport that is in the qualification process should be improved, not hidden.  'No discussion needed' is a lousy way to work in a community setting, particularly with a newer user who should be encouraged.  I am welcome to move it back into mainspace is what you meant to say I am sure.  Once again none of this is up to you.18abruce (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

2020 World Women's Curling Championship moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2020 World Women's Curling Championship, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  00:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

sorry for the delay
Took me a while before I had the time to pay attention to the curling articles, keep editing and trying please. You have as much right to determine what articles are in mainspace as anyone else, do not let 'lawyer' talk get you down or discourage you.18abruce (talk) 19:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)


 * No worries, thank you for taking the time promoting my pages back to mainspace. I was considering resubmitting it for approval, but this was much faster. It seemed silly for them to be moved to draft space when the event is so close and teams have already qualified for it. Happy editing! Edwyth (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Prix des libraires du Québec moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Prix des libraires du Québec, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 08:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Duolingo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please don't go around reverting without even bothering to explain what you are doing--especially when it concerns unencyclopedic and improperly verified marketing content. Drmies (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Duolingo. ''Sorry, but why you came to Wikipedia is irrelevant. The marketing information you keep reinserting is not of encyclopedic value. There is a link to the company website: that should suffice.'' Drmies (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

By the way, Pimsleur Language Programs had already been tagged for looking like an advertisement. It looks less so now. Drmies (talk) 20:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Drmies I submitted a query on the page's Talk tab. I don't believe I was vandalizing, that seems a stretch, but I will refrain. Edwyth (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * There is no "final warning" template for disruptive editing, which includes the things that you were doing, so I picked that one. Drmies (talk) 00:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Talkback
D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 22:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Prix des libraires du Québec


Hello, Edwyth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prix des libraires du Québec".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

September 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Qualification. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * You should just remove this, it is offensive. You should be proud of your work on the curling pages.  There was nothing remotely disruptive, or unconstructive, in anything you did.18abruce (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Queen of the Universe
I was wondering if you could help contribute to the Queen of the Universe page. The reality competition is a Paramount+ exclusive, and it needs a lot of work to match the other reality competition articles you've helped with. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Update to tell you tell to continue fixing the page by adding links to the songs performed, shortening the theme summaries, etc. BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * You know what to do. :) BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Haha, I'll do my best Edwyth (talk) 20:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

The Real Dirty Dancing
I was wondering if you could help contribute to the The Real Dirty Dancing (American TV series) page. It needs a lot of work to match the other reality competition articles you've helped with. BrickMaster02 (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Jennifer Westhagen moved to draftspace
Thanks for creating Jennifer Westhagen. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Rusalkii (talk) 07:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Only sourced to a database; see WP:SPORTBASIC. Rusalkii  (talk) 07:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

The Real Love Boat
Is it possible for you to update the results table for the article? It has barely been touched since the move to Paramount+, and it needs to be cleaned up (new contestants, eliminations being synced to the week it happened, etc.) The only thing I suggest keeping is the couple names still in play that are listed under the weeks. BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for thinking of me, but dating shows sadly aren't my thing and I wouldn't want to watch it to understand the elimination structure. I am sure there is someone out there that is excited by these dating shows, for me I don't understand why they are so popular. Edwyth (talk) 21:15, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Scotties
Sorry I didn't mean to delete your edits with mine. I copy pasted from before and published so it got rid of some of your edits in the process, my bad. TracyFleuryFan (talk) 05:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * No problem! I saw you were updating the overall results and I was like I'm just going to wait for TracyFleuryFan to finish before I add in all the Draw details! Edwyth (talk) 07:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Response on my talk page.
Hey! I left you a reply. Is it customary to go back and forth with replies, or just reply on one's own page whenever a comment is made? Look forward to reading your thoughts. --Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 22:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jennifer Westhagen
Hello, Edwyth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennifer Westhagen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

American Idol (season 21)
So, someone keeps removing the genders from the elimination chart claiming that "it's neutralizing" or something like that. And he demands that it should be removed from EVERY Idol article. Can you please discuss this, because you're more experienced with stuff like this? BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey Edwyth, nice to meet you. BrickMaster, unfortunately, doesn't seem to fully understand what is going on, but it's quite simple. Whether someone is male or female is irrelevant to note in those articles, and it enforces a gender binary that belongs to a different era. In addition, I'm sure you agree that using blue or pink to denote biological sex or even gender is from the time of our grandmothers, not ours, and that it has no place in an encyclopedic article. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello @Drmies That makes sense to me, I think this whole male/female thing was a holdover from American Idol 4-14 where it VERY much mattered what gender the contestants were because their Semi-Finals were divided that way (in the case of specifically Season 8 the highest voted male and female of each group in the semi-final round would make the top 13 automatically), so I think it is important that the gender of Season 4-14 be retained as it had very real implication on the results, but starting with Season 15 the gender of the contestant no longer played a factor in anything, so I am okay with removing it thereafter. How would you suggest denoting the gender of the contestants for season 4-14? Pink and Blue may be boring and outdated, but useful. Edwyth (talk) 09:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey Edwyth, thanks for the note. Yes, I remember that vaguely, but there has to be a better way than that color coding; "M/F" is already better. Anyway, that's not just up to me. Listen, would you mind posting this comment, maybe with some tweaks (to take me out of it), at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television? I posted there, to generate some wider interest, and I have no doubt there's editors there who would benefit from what you have to say, and that the community will be able to come up with a solution. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jennifer Westhagen


Hello, Edwyth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jennifer Westhagen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)