User talk:Eeekster/Archives/2012/March

Images
Fixed them. For source, I just linked them to the Club Penguin website. I mean, nobody else knows the account Johnny 115's password besides my dad and myself. Quiet Andrew! The McCarvers are coming! (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

image troubles AGAIN
I have an image of the Kia K9 I am trying to upload, and it is called KiaK9.jpg, but it comes up with an error saying "no html blah blah blah." Could you please explain this to me? Thanks. Quiet Andrew! The McCarvers are coming! (talk) 04:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and if you want, I'll try to make the CP images smaller. :)
 * I have no idea what would cause that error. Eeekster (talk) 05:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Help with page
Dear Eeekster,

My page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friendfin.com got deleted with the following reasons A7 (No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content).) and G11 (Unambiguous advertising or promotion.). I provided the info for this website from a neutral point of view, not sure what else I could do to avoid deletion. Can you help me as to what portions I can modify/add/delete so it can be accepted on wikipedia? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishik2 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Have you read up on notability policy? Eeekster (talk) 03:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Eeekster,

I did read notability guidelines. The only thing I don’t see in the article is “Significant coverage” but I did mimic the article by looking at some of the other articles like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meetic. As mentioned above if you could help as to what portions I can modify/add/delete so it can be accepted on wikipedia, I would really appreciate.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishik2 (talk • contribs) 00:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Bsr
Hi Eeekster, you just applied Bsr to File:Lavergneseal.png. I've reverted this, as the template is unnecessary for a copyrighted image used under fair use. Yes, the seal is copyrighted to the City of La Vergne, but that isn't even relevant in this situation, since by default this would be considered copyrighted unless proven otherwise, whereas that template is for situations where a free use license has been applied but there is no proof to back it up. Away from this issue, I see you do a lot of image patrolling, so I thank you for your diligent work! — Huntster (t @ c) 05:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you should me the policy that says a legit source isn't needed for fair use? Eeekster (talk) 05:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Um, I'm unsure what you mean by "legit source". It comes from the City of La Vergne's website, and is the seal used on all city vehicles, paperwork, etc...can't get much more legitimate than that. — Huntster (t @ c) 06:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Contesting WP:BLPPROD for article Tajama Abraham
Hi Eeek. I have contested the BLPPROD for that article here. Are you Ok with that? --Shirt58 (talk) 11:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

File:DutchSceenShot.jpg
Before you blindly slap delete tags on anything that you don't understand, take a look at it. If you actually bothered to check the context, you would have seen that it was created to illustrate (and helpfully solve) a display problem that appeared in a Route Diagram template. If you thinkyou can fix it with your eyes closed, then go right ahead. And besides, by definition, anything from Wikipedia is by definition copyright free, so I have no idea why you think a puf would be appropriate. Useddenim (talk) 12:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Attention Eeekster-bot&#58;

Re: your message
Hi, I am Anurag's PR agent, creating the page on his behalf. So it isn't an autobiographical article. Also, the references and links i have placed in the page can be used to evaluate the significance of Anurag's work. He is one of the upcoming authors and opinion makers on matters pertaining to the youth in India and his works are more widely read than some of the other authors who have an active profile on Wikipedia. Trust this clarifies. Regards, Anandanurag — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anandanurag (talk • contribs) 07:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, but it's still a conflict of interest and very much frowned upon here. Eeekster (talk) 07:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Michael Graziano, speedy deletion nomination
Hi, Eeekster

I am confused, perhaps you can clarify.

Michael Graziano owns the image Action map in monkey motor cortex.jpg. I manage his wikipedia page for him, and am uploading it according to my understanding of U.S. copyright law. He created this image, and has published it in several places, so I thought he could just publish it on a Wikipedia page, especially since it's about his own work.

Did I miss something?(quite likely) Or maybe we chose the wrong classification when we uploaded the image?

I would be grateful for any clarification you can offer.

thanks in advance

Brodmann1 Brodmann1 (talk) 16:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Please ask your questions at Media copyright questions. Eeekster (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Irfan Salim.jpg
Hi Eekster. I wasn't sure if this image would fly under the non-free exception for "promotion," but when I got the notification, I didn't know if it was automated just because I didn't tag the article correctly. Was hoping you could educate me on the rules for non-free promotional images.



I'm trying to add the image to my draft article of MarkMonitor that I'm working on with a paid COI (see disclosure) User:King4057 (COI Disclosure on User Page) 00:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Edmonton Light Rail Transit
117Avenue reverted ALL changes to the "Edmonton Light Rail Transit" page to the original content from prior to 15 March 2012. I thought I'd included an "edit summary" so why were my changes reversed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbfitz (talk • contribs) 15:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Kbfitz (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Why not ask 117Avenue? Eeekster (talk) 17:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

madapati hanumantha rao
The two photos uploaded are from the family album of Madapati Hanumantha Rao given by his daughter-in-law Madapati Sucheta. Some more photos will be added in future.Welcome to verify our personal Album at home. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jehara (talk • contribs) 18:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Read the notice. It tells you where to discuss the issue. Eeekster (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

5,000 Honour Killings
Thanks for the note, Eeekster. The reason for the removal was on the Talk page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Honor_killing#5.2C000_Annual_Murders_Citation

I have re-submitted the edit with the summary, linking to the reason. Thangalin (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

MUC16 Photo Deletion
This image was tagged for deletion for not adequately proving evidence that the assigned license was approved by the author: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Structure_of_MUC16.jpeg

Below the license I added a link to the page the book was published on. On the left hand side of that webpage is the copyright information. There is also an option to download a pdf of the book for free, which has the copyright information on the second page. The actual image can be found on page 71 (page 82 of the pdf). Let me know if this information is adequate or if I need to do something further.

Thank you!

--K. Beabout (talk) 21:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jhansi Rani Zee Tamil.jpg
See this. --மதனாஹரன் (talk) 12:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

speedy deletion
You know, we all appreciate cleanup of real trash articles. But you seem to be a bit quick to pull the deletion trigger with your twinkle. I had an under construction banner at the top of my page, and you tagged it for deletion. You didn't read the page. You didn't reply to any responses I posted. The mods didn't read the contested deletion, and the article is gone. the article was requested in the "articles for creation" section, for christ's sake. It's people like you that make me want to stop even contributing. That article didn't exist for more than an hour or two before you blasted it. I was working on it. THAT'S WHAT UNDER CONSTRUCTION MEANS! How about you get off the twinkle addiction and make a REAL contribution from time to time. --RichardMills65 (talk) 02:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you don't want your "under construction" articles deleted, then don't construct them in mainspace. Eeekster (talk) 02:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well I'm glad you straightened that out for me. From now on I will ask your permission before doing anything.--RichardMills65 (talk) 02:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Chill out, dude. Calabe1992 02:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:VON-A caricature.jpg
Just wanted to thank you for looking at the photo and giving feedback. I am not sure how to improve quality; I think the problem comes from the original scan; what I did was make a screen capture of an online book. The original was not the best, unfortunately. Thanks again!Jacqke (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't let it worry you. The tag is really just to let people know we could use a better copy. Eeekster (talk) 02:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Appreciate the knowlege.Jacqke (talk) 02:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

National Polka Festival
Email regarding use of the four photos on the National Polka Festival article page was forwarded to the email address permissions-en@wikimedia.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Algurley (talk • contribs) 18:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Wondering if you could please take off the warning about deleting the four photos on the National Polka Festival page. All releases and permissions were obtained by people in the photos, and the owner of the photos gave permission to publish the photos -- a copy of that email was sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Thanks.

Algurley (talk) 23:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The OTRS people will remove the delete tags when/if they verify the permissions. Eeekster (talk) 23:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Debra Weeks.jpg
There are no copyright issues involved with this photograph. It is a personal photograph made available by representatives of the subject. ReferenceArticle (talk) 20:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * And we know that how? Right now all I see is a previously published and copyrighted photo that you are claiming as your own work. Eeekster (talk) 22:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

The Voice UK
As your an adminisrator, could you do a history merge from User:MayhemMario/sandbox:The Voice UK to the main article, The Voice UK. Many thanks, Mayhem  Mario  17:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm an administrator? That's news to me. Eeekster (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ahahah! Whoops! Many apologies. Also, about the image you have nominated for deletion.

1) There is not a free image of Jessie J were in she is in spray jeans aswell as "Looking good" as the wirter said. Mayhem  Mario  17:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Request to remove the tag from the File:Syed Tajamul Hussain Naqvi Leading the Muharram Procession..jpg
Sir, This image belongs to me and it has been first time published only on wikipedia. I have enough evidence to prove that this photograph belongs to me and this is not published anywhere except wikipedia, so please remove the tag of deletion from File:Syed Tajamul Hussain Naqvi Leading the Muharram Procession..jpg. I have used it in an ineresting article so please donot delete it. Thanks.--Shahenshahkillz (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WIND_(spacecraft), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload?wpDestFile=Wind_publication_list_1996.pdf". Thank you. --Lynnbwilsoniii (talk) 22:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

File:8-stage, single-acting, pneumatic telescoping cylinder.jpg. & File:EHTC.5DPL Cylinder, 5-Stage.jpg.
Eeekster, this is in regards to files: File:8-stage, single-acting, pneumatic telescoping cylinder.jpg. File:EHTC.5DPL Cylinder, 5-Stage.jpg.

Whoops, sorry, didn't mean to remove any file deletion tags. About the pics, they're ours. We make telescoping air cylinders. Being that nobody else makes cylinders with so many stages, there are just no other pics out there of an 8-stage s/a air cylinder or a 5-stage d/a air cylinder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Vasell (talk • contribs) 04:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Just FYI  TransporterMan  ( TALK ) &#124; DR goes to Wikimania! 19:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and good job finding the source of the images. Eeekster (talk) 04:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Puerto de A Coruña.jpg
You tagged File:Puerto de A Coruña.jpg as it was a copyvio, but it is protected under CC~2.0 which clearly allows this. Please explain.  DreamField Arts  Talk 02:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I tagged it because I actually went and looked at the license and your claim of CC is in error. Eeekster (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * no it is not.  DreamField Arts  Talk 02:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Just looked again and it still shows the license to not be compatible with Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 02:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it should be on commons.  DreamField Arts  Talk 02:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No, it cannot be on commons. Read the license at the source. Eeekster (talk) 02:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah I am following it correctly.
 * According to Creative Commons 2.0; you are free to:
 * to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work
 * to Remix — to adapt the work
 * Under the following conditions:
 * Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
 * Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
 * Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.
 * With the understanding that:
 * Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be  waived  if you get permission from the copyright holder.
 * Public Domain — Where the work or any of its elements is in the  public domain  under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
 * Other Rights — In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license:
 * Your fair dealing or  fair use  rights, or other applicable copyright exceptions and limitations;
 * The author's  moral  rights;
 * Rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is used, such as  publicity  or privacy rights.
 * Notice — For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page.  DreamField Arts  Talk 03:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. means not compatible with Commons or Wikipedia in general. Eeekster (talk)`

Congratulations
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

```Buster Seven   Talk  14:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

8-stage_single-acting_air_cylinder,_Ergo-Help.jpg‎
Eeekster, I uploaded a CC licensed version of the file, as Wiki was battling with me about the original file having non-commons file status. And...my newly uploaded file is now up for speedy deletion??? What's the deal, I thought uploading a free-use file is what Wiki does want? George Vasell (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * It's the company's file and previously published. Eeekster (talk) 19:10, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Eekster, I'm confused by what you want, exactly. This is my pic, I took it, and posted it on my own website. Being that it was there first, I initially uploaded it to Wiki under copyright. That raised red flags here. So, here I am, re-uploading it under free licensing. Isn't that what you were asking for all along? George Vasell (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Your website? Looks like a corporation's website to me. If it is yours, then I see a conflict of interest problem. Eeekster (talk) 19:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

What conflict of interest? The page is about telescoping cylinders, and only had a discussion about hydraulic ones until I came along, adding content about pneumatic telescoping cylinders. Isn't that what Wikipedia is all about, the sharing of information? Again, you asked for a free-share pic of the cylinder, and here I am with a free-share pic. George Vasell (talk) 19:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

you submitted Greg Allan Dobbs for deletion
you submitted Greg Allan Dobbs for deletion, but I'd like to notify you that other article Greg Alan Dobbs is spelled incorrectly that is the reason of creating new article with correct name: Greg Allan Dobbs — Preceding unsigned comment added by B nikusha (talk • contribs) 21:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

File:School Crest HHS 001.JPG
Recently you tagged this school symbol as a "Photo of a copyright protected work." I have found a more appropriate tag for the image, since it is a photo of a School symbol. I have placed this tags *Non-free symbol and a Non-free media use rationale on the page for the School Symbol in question. -- Avazina, (Talk to me) 23:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Portrait_of_John_Francis_Mitchell,_Vice_Chairman,_Motorola.jpg
i am replying to your talk i am not sure what is happening for what i am supposed to do

i started over and resubmitted this photo, hopefully providing the correct info

joe (talk) 15:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)joe

Atieli Pakalani
now now mate. take it easy there tiger. i only just created it. that's why it has no references yet. give me time mate. i'm no magician. i can't just make a full article out of thin air. LOL!Sports port (talk) 02:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You were given ten days. Isn't that plenty? Eeekster (talk) 07:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * --Shirt58 (talk) 10:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.227.17 (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Work Motivation
You tagged this article I am working on for possible copy right violation. I used User:CorenSearchBot/manual and it came up as not being in any violation. Jastha08 (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Images on the Sarnia Article that I uploaded today
I removed the offending image today and will drive out to the location and snap a different picture myself. Thanks for the warning. I don't want to violate (don't think I did, but better to be safe than sorry). The article is Sarnia.TheKurgan (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Stop Adding Speedy Deletion Notices
I am trying to edit Griffy-G as much as I can, but I can't do it when you keep adding deletion notices to it! I will fix my article, but I'm no miracle worker, so please stop adding deletion notices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.215.107 (talk) 04:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No, he just not notable. Eeekster (talk) 04:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

I highly disagree. Everybody in our area knows him, and I bet he will become famous. So please remove the deletion notices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryay32 (talk • contribs) 04:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You said it: "will become famous". That means no article on Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 04:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)