User talk:Eemartin2/sandbox

Clare Ols Peer Review: Things that you did well: You've done a great job incorporating new text into the existing stub, as well as including in-text citations and hyperlinks. The article is easy to read for someone for who may not be familiar with the topic, and the hyperlinks make it easy to explore other terms. You've also done a good job remaining neutral.

Things to work on: Work on building your outline into the article while making sure that it stays organized with headers, etc. Some smaller suggestions - double check to make sure that your new edits are not simply restating the already existing text. Also make sure that your sentences are flowing a bit better - for example "Gene polymorphisms can occur in the coding or non-coding region of the genome. The majority of polymorphisms are silent, meaning that they do not alter the function or expression of a gene.[3] Gene polymorphisms in the coding region of the genome can alter the expressions of the gene and create variation within a give population" Add something in the italicized sentence that mentions this being an example of a polymorphism in a non-coding region, which is why gene expression is not altered.

Overall you've done a great job so far and the article will continue to improve as you add in content from your outline.

Claire Estep Peer Review
- I really think you have an excellent start thus far.

- You have incorporated the new information with the previously written article very well and maintained a consistent use of jargon.

- The sources look good and are hyperlinked correctly and all content clearly comes directly form a source.

- Very interesting topic. Acestep (talk) 23:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)