User talk:Eemctwo

Deleting the article
You have to opinion on the deletion debate.Curb Chain (talk) 00:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Particles
Thanks for your input on that article - I've not got a Ph.D. in anything but could see the flaws in the theory - but would point out that here on Wikipedia the accuracy of a theory isn't necessarily a bar to it having an article. What we really take account of is whether it's notable or not. Take Flat Earth theory - long disproved but having had adherents making enough noise to be of note. Similarly, Hollow Earth, the falsity of the Moon landings and other fringe theories that have sufficient coverage. The Fukushima theory here is obviously total bollocks (maybe not to its author...), and it hasn't achieved the coverage required yet so it should go. I can't see it gaining much coverage even in unreliable sources. Anyway, I hope to see you around now you've ventured in. Peridon (talk) 09:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)