User talk:EendrachtUnie

Thanks for alerting me to the policies mentioned below. I consider them all to be very sound and proper. The idea of starting a page on the trade union was not with the intention of self-promotion, but only to put some information out there to create a starting point for other users of Wikipedia to improve (as has already happened since). It is quite difficult to find unbiased sources for the material other than Solidarity itself, as even most media reports about the union are closely based on the union's own press releases. The fact that a new campus of Sol-Tech was opened, for example, is only verifiable from within Solidarity itself, or by physically going to the building itself. Nevertheless, it is a fact. I would like to post a comment on the discussion page stating that I am fully aware that, while I might do my utmost to avoid self-promotion, it may sometimes be unavoidable and that anyone is welcome to edit or even remove any of my contributions if they have reason to believe that the content is unsuitable for Wikipedia. After studying the guidelines more carefully, there are a few changes I'd like to make myself which would bring the article closer to NPOV already.

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I've never been a Solidarity member or involved with it in any way but I witnessed Solidarity's days of glory, struggle and fight for democracy in Poland.

I think good verifiable sources are essential for any article but of course even more important is NPOV (neutral point of view). As an insider you've got lots of material to build relevant articles but you must try to adhere strictly to the NPOV policy.

As you'll see over time creating an article is mostly a process of gradual expansion and transformation. I think you can learn the whole Wikipedia process along the way but watch out any lack of objectivity on your side. Always ask yourself a question "What would opponents of Solidarity include in the article?" There are always controversies and less favourable facts about any organisation that should find a place in the text but no doubt put into the right perspective.

Feel free to ask specific questions or ask for advice - I'll try to answer them best as I can.

Regards, Kpjas (talk) 18:42, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Solidariteit, does not meet our username policy.

'''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).'''

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:
 * Add on your user talk page. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Solidarity (South African trade union), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Your username request
Jarkeld (talk) 17:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)