User talk:Eestevez

Walter VI of Brienne
I returned Walter VI of Brienne to that title which is the proper format as described in the Naming conventions (names and titles). Unless you know of another Walter VI of Brienne that we need to disambiguate. Rmhermen 22:08, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)

That's fine, really, I got a little confused with the name at first. Thanks for the fresh perspective. --Eestevez 22:30, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * I also have had to change several of your edits because you keep leaving partial sentences. Even the first line of the article should be a full sentence. Rmhermen 22:45, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)

I will try to be more careful next time, thanks. --Eestevez 00:36, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hugh Bigod
Thank you for your valued insigts on Hugh_Bigod_%28Justiciar%29, linked to my page on Hugh_de_Bigod, which I wrote in attempting to compile a wikilist data base on the lord wardens of the cinque ports.

It appears to me that your 'Hugh Bigod - Justiciar' page should be the one linked to the cinque ports list, as you state he 'had the wardship of Dover Castle'... Furher research might require swapping the two pages over so that your item links from the list on the cinque ports page, do you concur? The title of lord warden was also combined with the office of the Constable of Dover Castle.

Faedra 12:04, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

If you agree, I am not sure how to go about swaping the pages so that the links remain correct betwwen them...


 * Thanks for your comments, but in reality I am not in a position to argue this issue. I spent a great deal of time working on the article "Hugh Bigod, 1st Earl of Norfolk". Initially, the article included three noblemen by the name of Hugh Bigod, my work on the 1st Earl of Norfolk got so long I decided to create a disambiguation page and separate the three noblemen in three different pages. So you see, I am not to credit, or familiar with the work on the Justiciar. Wish I could be of more help...

Image:BTaylor.jpg
Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:BTaylor.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks! Schissel 00:53, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bigod.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bigod.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:John-of-Damascus_01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:John-of-Damascus_01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 12:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)