User talk:Efe/Archive 19

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 21:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Beyoncé Knowles - Removed Info?
I see that among your edits you removed information I added regarding singles on her current album, I Am...Sasha Fierce. I originally noted their playing as new videos on the television music station BET on January 15, 2009 (my edit was, in GMT, 03:14, 16 January 2009). It seems your edit removed not only this reference, but ANY reference to the two new singles. Can you please explain their removal before I take the time to readd them? (I am asking first in case there's a valid reason here.) Thanks. CycloneGU (talk) 06:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thanks for dropping by. I am currently working an article so I am sorry to say that I cannot trace those edits of mine, as of now. However, if you would so kind, could you please provide me some diffs? Thanks a lot in advance. --Efe (talk) 06:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

GaGa
Excuse me! Do not critze me, whom do you think you are, I have had enough of you telling others what to do. If you read Rennax3's edits you will see it is vandilism. I can do what I want when I want, because I follow the rules. In the middle of a disscussion. The assoc acts section has not been edited in 2 days. Just stay out of my way, I have had enough of users telling this and that. oh and about you post you need to calm down. Kind Regards. Dance-pop (talk) 07:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I am not criticizing you. We co-exist and what we need is cooperation and understand each other. The issue here is not following the rules. Its about your behavior. --Efe (talk) 07:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * My behavior is fine ok, so you just stay there be quiet because your kinda annoying, got it bye. Dance-pop (talk) 03:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If your behavior is fine, then it should not attract a number of eyes. --Efe (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok I have had enough of this. You are such a loser. Thats why Im always right. Dance-pop (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Dance-pop, I am not here to either annoy you or whatever stuff that comes into your mind. I am trying to alleviate your edit war between Legolas and other users. --Efe (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Efe( A WEIRD USERNAME), you are annoying me so whats going up in that mind of yours. I can make a war with who ever I want. Stay out of me business, otherwise theres about to be another war. And you will lose. 03:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dance-pop (talk • contribs)
 * Please stop this kind of behavior Dance-pop. And please don't give other users such threats. Why should we stay out your business; you CO-EXIST with us. Please read the policy and guidelines of the project before you break them. --Efe (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I strongly disaggree, and this is getting serious, I have NEVER EVER harrsed anyone, what the policy describes is some of your behavior. I have never broken the guidelines. So I think it is time for you (to politely) stick it where the sun dont shine. I understand you concern, but you do not need to worry. I am usually right I follow the guidelines.

The Rules are there to guide us, they are a, not LAW Kind Regards. 04:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * So what do you call that "you're such a loser". It drives nice people to madness. At least I'm not. But, OK, can we just talk calmly? No exclamation points? --Efe (talk) 06:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, but this is not an apology, I am a nice person but when someone attacks ME for unknown reason(I have done nothing wrong). I have been in the right all the time, every alleged edit war and posts, I have been in the right. You said I need to stop my edit war and posts but I have always been in the right. I will try to calm down(not be so aggressive). If you the previos posts on my page, people are telling me what to do. E.g.-Realist, YOU, and esepically, espically Renanx3 and Legalos--those to are really annoying. And whats wrong with bold and excalmation marks? Dance-pop (talk) 07:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Now, let's start again. Regarding your addition of the possible single, I removed it per WP:CRYSTAL (as stated in the edit summary). Charmed reverted your edit, and you reverted her edit. That causes an edit war how trivial the matter is. I suggest if someone removes someone's with proper edit summary, better discuss the matter at the talk page and call the attention of the involved parties. --Efe (talk) 07:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

OK. Hers a source- http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/02/on-the-scene-la.html Its says its going to be the next single Dance-pop (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. I have traced your edit summary. But it does not state if the song is going to be released as a single. Perhaps its a sign that its her next single but we cannot just speculate like that. A source has to support it. Its going to be removed. --Efe (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I some what agree, the source does suggest it. Dance-pop (talk) 07:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

WHY??? Dance-pop (talk • contribs) 04:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:My Boo Video.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:My Boo Video.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the cleanup and sourcing of the Jesse McCartney article
I just wanted to say thank you for that. That article really needed it, as you already know. Flyer22 (talk) 03:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks Flyer. I was interested recently with this guy because of "It's Over". --Efe (talk) 04:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Getting out of hand!!
Look at this. Man! I can't control it. I'm on the point of raising an ANI. &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. I cannot help you about this matter... as of 12 pm. I have to eat my lunch. Hehe. I'll get into this matter, maybe later later. --Efe (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh its 12 already? Its 10 'o' clock here. I just had my breakfast. I feel cozy now sitting in my chair, with my coffee and wiki!!!!! Yeahhhhh &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Efe, about this ANI. I am willing to give one last chance. Next time i want your help in the ANI. I have never raised an ANI so not very sure about the whole procedure so not raising now. I want to consult with you before raising it. &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beyoncé The Ultimate Performer
Yo Efe, sorry to say I've put the Beyoncé The Ultimate Performer article up for deletion as it's been tagged for notability since September 2007 and I couldn't find any decent sources. I didn't realise such an august contributor as yourself had started it. In any case, you probably have a better idea than I as to how best to deal with it, so if you think it's salvagable then please give it a makeover. Ciao, Skomorokh  06:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Skomorokh, how are you? "I didn't realise such an august contributor as yourself had started it." Well, I was only a "kid" when I created that one. Until now, no decent sources are available online. I am planning to delete it myself but since some other editors had contributed to it, I think a PROD/AFD is fine. --Efe (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

ANI
Since you're involved... WP:ANI. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 18:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I left a comment there. --Efe (talk) 00:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

PR
Glad to help - finally got around to reviewing the third one and did some copyedits there. Keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 22:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Efe (talk) 00:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Rihanna discography
Immediate protection is needed. Continuous addition of BADCHARTS and unreleased singles. Total messing up the discography. I have reverted to a clean version but please protect it fast!! - &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 10:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Try alternatives like adding a hidden comment on the page or dropping notifications to IPs. Not much activity or yesterday to warrant a protection. --Efe (talk) 10:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it started immediately after the previous protection expired few days back. Well i'll include hidden comments and have also kept it on my watchlist *rolls eyes*. Lets see. He he, those IPs will have a tough time adding bad charts. I'll be their tireless reverter. What say? &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 10:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. You're a... a... tireless reverter. Hehe. Well, we don't use the tool for preemptive measures. If the page is being attacked by vandalism, drop me a message. If only bad charts, I am afraid. But still drop me a message. I'll help you educate them about the guidelines of WP. --Efe (talk) 10:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll do that surely. Lols. &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 11:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

My apologies
My apologies if I came off unusually pushy at Talk:Rihanna. My goal wasn't to offend any other editors or to try and "have it my way" with the argument. I want what's best for the article like everyone else. -- Wh ip it !  Now whip it good! 00:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, no big deal. I am even shocked to find an apology of yours in my talk page. I was even happy that many editors visited the talk page. --Efe (talk) 00:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Disruption at GaGa-seicer talk
Hey I am not attacking anyone or admin for that matter I am showing my anger at a "bad admin", why I are you calling me boy, I could by a girl, lady, man, heshe, etc. for that matter, Do NOT BE SEXIST! Dance-pop (talk) 04:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * And how do you call that "you're the worst admin"? Anyway, you are bound to your opinion over other users... and admins are bound to protect WikiPedia from disruption. Hey! I am not sexist. I suppose you're a girl. Anyway, how are you? --Efe (talk) 04:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Your right I am bound to my own opinion, but I dont disrupt wikipedia and/or its users, I think I have explain this before. I just got the impression and then assumed that you were sexist from you comment on seicers page, Im a guy by the way, I thought you would have got that from my "alleged" aggresion. Im fine just a bit angry for my wrongful blocking, I did nothing wrong. I was like WTF and OMFG I did nothing wrong at seicer I didnt even expect it and then after the block I was I am going to do some horrible stuff to him( but I couldnt write that obviusly, but if I met him boy would he be sorry-Not a theat by the way-just hypothitcally). So now I got two attributors to sort out this whole mess. And what about you? Dance-pop (talk) 05:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, but there are limitations, though. You might be surprised when he blocked you, but that's how WikiPedia works. As long as there are grounds for blocking, the next time you know, you cannot edit for one, two, three days, etc. I did not block you for I am involved in the article. Going back to the current events, I am struggling to finish some of my projects. --Efe (talk) 05:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey I think we have got our second Dance-pop. Please keep an eye on User:Youstinklmao. A possible edit war can start again. &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Second dance-pop real funny(sarcasm--i dont think you know it because i have tried it before), perphaps a second Legalos for all ways saying bad source. Now thats funny. Anyway I think I could help with the projects. Tell me what they are ill try to help.I think wikipedia needs to review there rules. Dance-pop (talk) 05:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Uhm, I don't think so. Hehe. Sure. --Efe (talk) 05:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL. Whats the minor stuff tell me.Dance-pop (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Just visit the talk page to "Eh, Eh". --Efe (talk) 06:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Ips
Efe, vandilism is vandlism, I will not drop the messages. I follow the rules that is what you tell me to do. and you cant assume what Ips know. Do not pre-judge. So, if I request protection then I will. Because I am not going clean an Ips mess, why should I. As a foolow adim you should understand. So before you edit my user talk, think about your past edits as well. Sorry if the comments are a bit harsh.Dance-pop (talk) 09:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Help
Hi its dance-pop, in just wondering how to change the image for lady gaga discography. I have tryed but cant. Thanks.Dance-pop (talk) 11:09, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Just copy the file link (e.g. Lady gaga performing.jpg) of the image and paste it in the image parameter in the Artist Discography infobox. Please take note that it does not include "File" as in "File:Lady gaga performing.jpg". --Efe (talk) 04:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dance-pop (talk • contribs) 05:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Welcome. --Efe (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Rihanna
Hi there. I note that you just removed a section on this page. The discussion was requiring a verifiable source, which I provided with this link. Consensus was to include the information, but that it needed a good source, which I have now provided. --Chasingsol(talk) 08:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No. Over Rihanna's article, there was no consensus yet. --Efe (talk) 08:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I strongly disagree. Please read the discussion closer. The discussion was about requiring a verifiable source that did not speculate as to who the victim was. The LA Times article has stated that police sources have confirmed the victim as Rihanna. The section should be readded. --Chasingsol(talk) 08:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I suggest you discuss it at the article talk page. I am not the only user involved in this. There are too many... including IPs. --Efe (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Efe. I went ahead and added the information, since it appears that consensus is clear that we should include it. Considering the amount of traffic that the article is receiving and that the information is confirmed from multiple reliable sources, it would be in our best interests to include it since visitors will be looking for information. Best regards. --Chasingsol(talk) 01:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Thanks for the concern. Perhaps when it is there, further corrections will be made to agree with the guidelines especially BLP. No worries. --Efe (talk) 03:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

They've been notified. I've made the same request at Chris Brown and at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. The Bookkeeper  (of the Occult)  08:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your visiting there. --Efe (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't need u opinio, i know... wikipedia is not a forum... Vítor & Rihanna (talk) 18:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Take a look
Can you please take a look ? I think it should be speedly deleted, right? Renanx3 (talk) 20:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. Its an image vio. Don't worry. It will be deleted by Feb 22, as the template says. --Efe (talk) 05:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; February 16, 2009


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 06:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

GaGa BDR
Hi. Could you please help me with this page for deletion-Lady GaGa BDR Deletion page, could you please review it thanks.Dance-pop (talk) 03:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll check it later. --Efe (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you think about it? It still doesnot look like having enough info to warranty a separate song page. A lot of gaps are there in the article. Problem is people are comparing it with the Britney song Radar, but Radar we had enough sources to certify its release and shelving as well as its charting on a number of charts. Its not the same with this one. All we know is it was supposed to be released but the music video was used to promote the series DSM instead. Thats it! I'm not sure about it yet. &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm back
Hey i'm back!!! How was your weekend? What did u do on Valentine's Day?? He he. &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 04:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nothing. Just working on my assignments in school. You? --Efe (talk) 12:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 13:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm trolled
Look at this. He he. Do you know what to do regarding this? Also check out the user-name concern. &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 06:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I suggest you drop a message on the admin who blocked Dance. --Efe (talk) 12:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks as always. By the way, a small help. I want to upgrade my sign to something flashy. He he. Can you help me with that? I want it to be coloured blue but don't know how to format it. :-) &quot;Legolas&quot; (talk) 13:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Here: Legolas  . It would look like this:  Legolas . --Efe (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I just experimented. What do you think about it?? --Legolas!!  ( talk to me ) 13:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Just fine. --Efe (talk) 23:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

List of number-one singles from the 2000s (UK)
Hi, I saw your comment on the featured list review page - would you mind giving me a better way of phrasing it. Thanks. 03md (talk) 15:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Beautiful, Dirty, Rich
Hey, the BDR deletion request has been closed stating no consensus. What to do with the article now? Dance-pop is blocked for a week now, hence i don't think any other improvement is possible for the article. Shall we merge it? --Legolas!! ( talk to me ) 05:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No idea. Have to review what to do after there's no consensus. It's also unfair for Dance, although he can still comment/discuss with us using an IP. --Efe (talk) 06:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If anyone proposes a merge, the main discussion should be done at the article's talk page. If the page is merged and redirected to the main article, it could always be undone without an administrator's involvement (unlike page deletion). Themfromspace (talk) 08:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I know man, i didnot expect a 1 week ban for Dance, though i expect he had it coming. Well a merge is fine by me, we can merge it to the album page, seeing that there's hardly any content to offer a wholesome song space, a merge is what it propose. I'll open a discussion at the talkpage. --Legolas!!  ( talk to me ) 08:28, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for being so slow today. Been so busy with real life responsibilities. --Efe (talk) 09:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No matter sweets. Hey i just read that Dance-pop's been banned for a month. That's so bad Efe!! can't we do something about it?? And take a look at this!!! Man that's ghastly!! --Legolas!!  ( talk to me ) 09:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Its really sad. Dance has never been a disrupt at all times. I am even afraid for him. If he continues to do the same thing, it might result to an indefinitely block. Regarding Rihanna, that picture is horrible. Who made that? It looks like her. --Efe (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't know yaar who made that or whether its a real pic! By the way did you hear the news about the oscar winner's list getting leaked? --Legolas!!  ( talk to me ) 09:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope. Who "prematurely" won? --Efe (talk) 11:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Slumdog Millionaire as usual. Kate Winslet got the best actress (yayy) while Mickey Rourke best actor. Heath Ledger and Amy Adams for supporting roles. By the way, a discussion is open at the talk page of Beautiful, Dirty, Rich. Share your inputs. --Legolas!! ( talk to me ) 11:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Poker Face's sample
Hello,

You say that my link is not a reliable source. Are you saying that this track is not Boney M.'s Ma baker ? :(

Ftiercel (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily. But the source you used isn't reliable, no info there stating "Poker Face" has some elements that are sampled. If its true, its also an original research. We need to find a reliable source that confirms it. --Efe (talk) 12:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Title of Spanish language songs
Mabuhay! I'm writing you here because on the "Music Project" page never answers and me anybody. I have noticed that in many articles about Spanish albums and song every word is titled with initial upper case. That's incorrect. According to Spanish spelling rules, only the first element is written with upper case, as Entre el mar y una estrella ("Entre El Mar Y Una Estrella" and "Entre el Mar y Una Estrella", etc. are INCORRECT). I'm a Thalía fan, so I looked at Template:Thalía and I renamed all titles I could to the correct form. But somebody always re-renames them to the incorrect form. So, could you please delete Tú y yo and Ten paciencia (actually they're redirections to the wrong titles) and rename "Tú y Yo" and "Ten Paciencia" to "Tú y yo" and "Ten paciencia"? Maraming salamat. --El Mexicano (talk) 18:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I am sorry El Mexicano, I am not an expert in grammar especially in regional cases (e.g. Spanish, Latin. etc.) But as far as I know, proper nouns like song titles are an exemption of some rules. Perhaps you check other websites or album liner notes on how they spell those titles. Hope that helps. --Efe (talk) 05:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Here. Billboard magazine writes it in all caps. --Efe (talk) 05:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I know that, also in the album covers they write it so, but it is still incorrect. I think that although artists may not be aware of official spelling rules, in an encyclopedia we must write titles correctly. Royal Spanish Academy does not mention any exception. The same mistake is writing Thalía's name without an accent on the "i". Even if you write it with CAPITALS, you must put the accent: THALÍA. It's just a bad custom that artists and Latin American media do not write it so. Artistically, you can use different graphics, font-types, etc. but "artwork" should not be an excuse for not keeping spelling rules. Regards, --El Mexicano (talk) 11:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you visit WP:MOS. There are professional editors who can help you most than me. --Efe (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I added some information to the naming section of the project page. I hope it will be useful. Regards, --El Mexicano (talk) 19:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information. I have opened a discussion to alert other members of the project (FYI, I am not a member of WP:SONGS. Hehe.). --Efe (talk) 07:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Smile!


A NobodyMy talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
 * Thanks for the smiley. --Efe (talk) 23:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

File:My Boo Video.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:My Boo Video.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Stifle (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Kindly delete. --Efe (talk) 23:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

TK Article
Dear Efi, I have changed the line of ISO Certification and have also provided an external reference of SGS website. Kindly check. Best Regards. (Tkmark (talk) 07:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC))
 * I am worried it fails to meet WP:WEB. It will be deleted. --Efe (talk) 07:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:


 * Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
 * An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
 * News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
 * Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
 * Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
 * Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 01:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

The Fame Ball Tour
Do you think the Afd nomination of the above article is valid? The reason given for nomination is so very strange. Can you please share your thoughts at the discussion page? --Legolas!! ( talk to me ) 11:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * My input. --Efe (talk) 11:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Hey i have a question to ask. You know i haven't been on wikipedia for long, and am still learning stuff here. What do you think of my edits here? Are they fine? Or what improvements can i insert while editing? I'm just looking for an opinion. He he. --Legolas!!  ( talk to me ) 12:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I think I have to review your edits in the past months but in my daily encounter with you, they seem fine and you understand the policies here. --Efe (talk) 12:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * He he. Thanks. --Legolas!!  ( talk to me ) 12:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * =) --Efe (talk) 12:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Efe, how you been? Its been a while. Listen, [again] I want to apologize for not helping out with the PR for "Yellow". I wasn't sure what to do, for the PR, so I didn't want to mess up the article setting, so I left it to you. Sorry. Listen, I was hoping if you can give your thoughts on "Lovers in Japan". Is the info. ready to be placed in the article? Also, is it... ready? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It seems good. I suggest, though, to put the "listy" song version after the section music video or merge it with tracklisting. Its fine. I've been also busy with other stuffs so I kinda set our plans aside. --Efe (talk) 03:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll do that. Yeah, I see that your busy working with other stuff and its fine. Your an admin. and admins. got a lot of work to do, so its understandable. :) I guess our project is gonna have to be put on hold. But, hey we're not in a rush with this, so. Thanks for the advice, I appreciate it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps after I've done my real life responsibilities we could push through the plan. --Efe (talk) 07:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That would be great. I guess if I work out my personal responsibilities, as well, we can definitely work this out. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Then that's settled. Just tell me when you're ready so that I can hasten up finishing my stuffs here. --Efe (talk) 05:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, how 'bout during St. Patrick's weekend? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh my. I forgot its final examination season. In the Philippines, we culminate every school year in March. I am not really sure if I'll have extra time but I can still pitch in, although not fully. --Efe (talk) 04:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I totally forgot about that. Alright, I definitely know I'm going to be busy during Spring break, how 'bout Cinco de Mayo? Also, I've nominated "Lovers in Japan", so if you can help out with the review, it would be most appreciated. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I will be stress free by early April. May is fine for the nom. I can see what I can do. --Efe (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, I need help. Do you have a photo for "Lost!"? I checked flickr. There are lots, very nice, but I don't know which one. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 08:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright cool, then May it is. :) Um, no I don't have a photo for "Lost!", but I'll check some out. If you found some photos, meaning links, let me know and maybe I can help out or something. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK. --Efe (talk) 23:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Avril Lavigne Nobody's Home CD Maxi.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Avril Lavigne Nobody's Home CD Maxi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 22:58, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Gaga
Hey Efe, come to the talkpage at the LAdy Gaga and Starlight revenue section. Can you tell whether Blast Magazine is a WP:RS? Also we have a hostile revert in the Gaga discography section. Can you please help me out? --Legolas ( talk to me ) 13:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have commented there although not sure it would help. Regarding the reverts, I don't want to chip in. Both you and Realist are working. --Efe (talk) 00:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * P.S. Could you time and again keep an eye on this user? I havea feeling we have Dance-pop back. --Legolas  ( talk to me ) 04:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure. Some of his/her edits are help, though. --Efe (talk) 04:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:


 * Books extension enabled
 * News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
 * Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Katy Perry
The article, Katy Perry has failed its GA review. Please view the GA page for details. Thank you, and good luck! The article will DEFINITELY pass its second nomination when its errors are fixed, and if it's given a copyedit by a copyeditor. CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough for failing the article. It was my fault, I concede, for writing the article that fast. I haven't checked the errors. However, in my experience of reviewing articles before, GAs are not that strict and the problems laid out in the review page could be addressed in a mere day or two to three days. I believe it does not meet only two to three of the criterion, prose and some inline citations, though I am sure every line there were completely based on sources. Anyway, thanks for the review. It helped a lot. --Efe (talk) 09:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I apologize if my review seemed too strict, as I had said in the review, I was torn on passing or failing the article. However, most of the reason for me failing it was that I believed it needed a good copyeditor. However, I am sure that as you said, you could fix the errors in a few days, after you sent that message. Feel free to re-nominate the article I pointed out, as I am sure the article would DEFINITELY pass in a second review. You did a great job! Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 03:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's fine. You don't have to apologize. Sometimes, when an article needs a good copy edit, better fail them. Thanks for the review, though. It will help me fix what has to be done before renomination. Cheer. --Efe (talk) 04:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The article looks much better now, you did a great job! CarpetCrawler (talk) 05:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you Carpet. --Efe (talk) 05:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If whoever reviews it still finds issues, let me know and I'll see if I can lend a helping hand. :) Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure. Thanks in advance. --Efe (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)