User talk:Efeliciano ms

Reference errors on 7 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * On the José Juan Barea page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=679968389 your edit] caused an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F679968389%7CJosé Juan Barea%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2016
Your recent editing history at Francisco Lindor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Deja de cambiar la foto
Deja de cambiar la maldita foto, ya me tienes harto. ¿¡Te lo tengo que decir así para que entiendas pedazo de c*$#!? Seriesphile (talk · ctb) 00:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You are not the only one tired here. You have not given any reason at all for posting your chosen picture. It is not cropped, does not look professional. Please stop this unnecessary editing war but specially I hope you stop your use of that kind of language which was uncalled for WP:TALKNO. – Efeliciano_ms  (talk · ctb)

Tiburones de Aguadilla
Deja de crear artículos a lo loco maldita sea, llevo tiempo creando el artículo para los Tiburones en mi sandbox solo para que venga un estúpido como tú a crear una mierda de artículo, ni siquiera sigues las guidelines. Si vas a hacer porquerías mejor no hagas nada. Seriesphile (talk · ctb) 01:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Si el problema es quien la creo o no puedes quedartela. La temporada empezo ya hace unas semanas y aun no habia una pagina y por eso la añadí. Creando páginas no llevo mucho. Use el de Los Indios de Mayaguez como modelo pensando que estaba bien. WP:TALKNO. –  Efeliciano_ms  (talk · ctb)
 * En otro tema relacionado. Me puse a mirar tu sandbox pq soy relativamente nuevo creando content y queria ver un ejemplo y nada primero vi lo de Aguadilla. De verdad que la creé la pagina pq soy del area del equipo y pense q no existia y nadie la iba a crear anytime soon pq volvieron este año y nomles ha ido muy bien. So anyway, se ve bn so far, Honestamente. Y ps ya q vi que estas editando de lo del clasico, crees q se pueda hacer o se deba hacer una del squad especificamente de PR pal del 2017?! Se que hay una pagina de los diversos squads pero seria para que fuera documentando los que han dicho que si y los que no como Arenado. – Efeliciano_ms  (talk · ctb)

Biografías
¿Por qué estás añadiendo la bandera azul celeste de Puerto Rico a muchas biografías? Seriesphile (talk · ctb) 06:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Foto
Deja de estar cambiando la maldita foto solo porque te dá la maldita gana, aquí NO estamos buscando una foto que se vea "profesional." La que estoy poniendo está más que bien y es de las más recientes. Por favor ya deja la mierda que tienes contra mí que el que se jode por culpa tuya soy yo y también lee las guidelines de lo que vayas a editar antes de hacer ediciones a lo loco. Si sigues revirtiendome te voy a reportar y no vas a poder editar más nunca en Wikipedia. Tú eliges. Seriesphile (talk · ctb) 02:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Los guidelines si mencionan que no se vea "amateurish". Pero vez que podías conseguir una foto mejor que la que estabas poniendo. Deja de ser tan obstinado. – Efeliciano_ms  (talk · ctb)
 * "Amateurish"? Esa foto fue tomada por una cámara profesional. Oh y al menos podías decirme que me ibas a robar mí firma sé original please. Seriesphile  (talk · ctb) 02:58, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Escuela de la Comunidad Especializada en Deportes en el Albergue Olímpico (ECEDAO)
Hello Efeliciano ms,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Escuela de la Comunidad Especializada en Deportes en el Albergue Olímpico (ECEDAO) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

KSFT (t 02:47, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Melanoma
Thank you for your recent contributions to the Melanoma article. I am sorry about the confusion about WP:MEDRS. I see that you re-added the content with the original medline cited paper. You were correct in that a journal citation is preferred to news source, however, we will still need to find a "secondary source" to present this information in the encyclopedia. Has this work been reviewed elsewhere on medline? Please let me know know if you have any questions or need assistance interpreting MEDRS or finding appropriate high-quality reliable sources. I have created a "cheat sheet" for new medical editors in which I have attempted to summarize MEDRS for new medical editors who are accustomed to writing reviews journal articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JenOttawa/Introduction_to_Medical_Editing:_Cheat_Sheet We greatly appreciate medical editors on Wikipedia! Welcome!

Jenny (WikiProject Medicine Board Member) JenOttawa (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your support. The content I had added had the intention of letting know the recent research discoveries from a peer reviewed journal. I understand how it failed to be supported by a secondary source. Is there a section in the Melanoma article in which such findings can be exposed? Thanks once again for your help. -Edwin Efeliciano_ms (talk) 20:01, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message . I usually edit with systematic reviews, but it is my understanding that once the new findings are reviewed in the literature (systematic review, review article, text book, by an authoritative medical organization, etc), they would be suitable to add, as long as they are given an appropriate "weight" in the article, depending on the level of evidence. WP:MEDMOS has the manual of style for medical articles and there is usually a research section in most articles.JenOttawa (talk) 21:17, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * One of the problems of writing medical content for an encyclopedia (in contrast to a medical journal) is that the huge volume of medical research creates a tension with the encyclopedic principle of reporting established knowledge. Not every piece of research turns out to be accurate or reproducible, and some research has flawed methodologies, despite peer-review. Wikipedia editors should not be having to make the sort of analyses needed to determine whether any given conclusion is significant in the light of how the research was conducted and whether there are competing or complementary results from other research. To avoid that problem, we have agreed that in the field of medicine, it is not sufficient for a source merely to be peer-reviewed, but it must be a high-quality secondary source, where experts in the field have analysed as much of the relevant literature as possible and drawn together a conclusion based on that analysis. The types of source that are characteristic of that process include literature reviews, systematic reviews and position papers from expert bodies (who, we assume, have done that sort of review in order to offer a position on a topic).
 * Many well developed articles will contain a Research section, as does Melanoma, but it is obvious that we cannot include every piece of research without completely unbalancing the article. So we have to be selective about what is included. One rule of thumb is that where mainstream third-party sources have taken a lot of notice of a piece of research – often where it is particularly ground-breaking –  then it is probably of sufficient interest to be considered for inclusion in Research as it may be an indicator for future developments on the topic. Nevertheless, I would always advise seeking consensus on the talk page of the article, if there is a chance of the edit being controversial.
 * I hope that helps. --RexxS (talk) 09:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your messages. It has been a lot of help understanding the essence of a medical article. As I live in a caribbean island where many specialist such as dermatologist are in shortage, it gave me hope to see a study that gave new possibilities to a blood test that can help screen potential cases. I will probably post it in the talk page of Melanoma in order to keep this new development alive and hopefully make it to the article later on when more evidence is hopefully discovered and developed to use in clinical settings and thus save countless lives. Thanks once again for your support.
 * Greetings from Puerto Rico. --Edwin. Efeliciano_ms (talk) 21:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Greetings from Canada :) I think that is a good idea to post this on the talk page for future reference or to see if anyone knows of a high-quality secondary source that summarizes this research. If you have any other ideas of content to add to medical articles, please feel free to send me a message. We greatly appreciate new volunteers! JenOttawa (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your support. I just posted about this in the melanoma talk page. This has been a quality learning experience and I will definitely try to contribute more to articles in a near future. Thanks for your encouragement.
 * Gracias(Thank you). --Edwin. Efeliciano_ms (talk) 1:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hope to see you back on WikiProject Medicine soon! JenOttawa (talk) 00:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Gracias(Thank you). --Edwin. Efeliciano_ms (talk) 1:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hope to see you back on WikiProject Medicine soon! JenOttawa (talk) 00:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Cancun See-also
I reverted you addition to the See-also section of the Cancun article because it did not link to a WP article. The See-also section is for links to other articles in Wikipedia that are related to the current article, but are not linked in the text of the article. - Donald Albury 20:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. I am not clear as to why it should not be included. I did not see the Cancún Underwater Museum being mention in any part in the article. I had hoped that by adding it in the See also section people will eventually add the museum article to the Cancún article and in the mean time know about its existence as even tough is relatively new, it has become a trendier atraction that helps relieve pressure over the natural reef. Efeliciano ms (talk) 22:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

I was looking again and I forgot the brackets for the Cancún Underwater Museum. Is that what you meant? Efeliciano ms (talk) 22:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * That is fine. Thank you.- Donald Albury 23:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

List of Puerto Ricans
Your addition of Neftalí Rivera to the list was removed because the instructions of inclusion were not followed. These include the following:

You can add the name once more to the list with the proper sources. Take care, Tony the Marine (talk) 22:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

File:AnuncioCrashBoat.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AnuncioCrashBoat.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2022 FIBA 3x3 AmeriCup


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2022 FIBA 3x3 AmeriCup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Dewasi. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC)