User talk:Eg0264a/sandbox

Matt Rumohr's Peer Review
This article seems to be well on its way for a higher rating by the Wiki staff and reads as a more common page based on the wide spread of information on the topic being presented.

I think that the lead is structured fantastically with an increased level of explanation the further you read into it. I think it is a fantastic introduction to this term that would otherwise confuse people who have never read it before. While the term jargon itself is extremely confusing sometimes, it is supplemented by examples later on in the page.

The Industry term section gets a bit more weight than the others, but it seems that it is needed due to the need of a more long-winded explanation as well as examples of what the definitions are trying to convey. With that being said the other sections would benefit from more information being put into them to explain in more detail what is important about that section to the term overall.

I think that the article is organized well with the flow of topics and ideas being talked about. I would keep it in the same order as it currently is.

The article does a great job using neutral information and covers a wide array of viewpoints on the term and how it is being used in many fields of study and different languages.

Overall, I would say that this article simply needs some polishing and a bit more information and then it will surely be acceptable to move up to the next class of articles.

Mr0960a (talk) 18:10, 23 February 2019 (UTC)