User talk:Egavaldo

Speedy deletion of "XQual"
A page you created, XQual, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:


 * No content. Any article consisting only of external links, category tags and "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 21:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. S M S  Talk 21:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

XStudio
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of XStudio, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

XStudio
I have deleted XStudio again because the article does not assert the notability of the subject. Please read up on Wikipedia's definition of notability and in particular the criteria you need to meet for an article on XStudio. You should also read our core policiy on verifiability which is an important part of what makes Wikipedia an encyclopedia. If you have futher questions you are welcome to leave them on my talk page. Thanks, Gwernol 23:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your message on my talk page. Did you read our guidelines on notsbility? Quoting from them:

A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.


 * "Presumed" means objective evidence meets the criterion, without regard for the subjective personal judgments of editors. Substantive coverage in reliable sources suggests that the subject is notable.
 * "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive.
 * "Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.
 * "Sources," defined on Wikipedia as secondary sources, provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally preferred.
 * "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc.

A topic for which this criterion is deemed to have been met by consensus, is usually worthy of notice, and satisfies one of the criteria for a stand-alone article in the encyclopedia. Verifiable facts and content not supported by multiple independent sources may be appropriate for inclusion within another article.

In other words you need to show that there have been multiple, independent, published articles written abut XStudio. Thanks, Gwernol 13:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)