User talk:Egberht

Welcome!
Hello, Egberht, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Bristol. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! &mdash; Rod talk 07:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Saxon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

"Ancwe" (Ancillary World English), "Anglonic"
I've reverted a number of your edits as you appear to be using Wikipedia to promote new concepts. Please see WP:PROMOTION. When these are widely discussed in reliable souces that would be the time to add them to appropriate articles. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 16:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anglish Moot


A tag has been placed on Anglish Moot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro  talk  18:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


 * my comments above are relevant to this. Do you understand this? Doug Weller (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Anglish Moot, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  20:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Wessex
My OED says Hardy revived the name. Doug Weller (talk) 19:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anglish Moot


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning (talk) 20:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Anglish Moot
In fact if we view it as a group it doesn't meet our criteria at Notability (organizations and companies). "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it."

Our criteria for websites is at Notability (web). If you read both guidelines you'll see your site doesn't meet our criteria. And it is certainly against our policies to create a complaint in article space, so that will be deleted shortly. Doug Weller (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Thomas Hardy's Wessex
Please stop adding totally unsourced and POV edits to the above article. Wikipedia operates by quoting reliable sourced edits and not personal views. Failure to abide by Wikipedia conventions could see you blocked from editing. Thank you and regards, David J Johnson (talk) 22:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

It is not unsourced. Whatever you are doing is not in the spirit of Wikipedia as I thought it was conceived, i.e. the pursuit of knowledge. You can verify the truth of what I have written for yourselves if you weren't so prejudiced. I have given the source of the information which is the Oxford English Dictionary online. Are you conducting a coordinated vendetta? What qualifications do you people have?

Did you actually bother to read what I had written? It does not seem like it.

I am quite angry.

I don't think you know much about the subject, do you? so you take the easy option. For example, what is meant by the statement that the Wessex Regionalist Party is "sessionist"? Do have any proof of that assertion?

Do you have any proof that the name Wessex was in use before, as the OED online states, it was coined by William Barnes in 1869?