User talk:Egbodo huddy

August 2017
Hello, I'm MPFitz1968. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Thundermans have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MPFitz1968 (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bella and the Bulldogs. Your edits appear to consti am going to kill you mothersucking idiotvandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 05:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Egbodo huddy. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Jim1138 (talk) 05:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jace norman and isabella morner


A tag has been placed on Jace norman and isabella morner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —C.Fred (talk) 23:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

recent edits
Hi Egbodo huddy, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! Primefac (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

😤😣 angry
Apology accepted okay you could gave just told me that i would have deleted ot myself mcheerewww Egbodo huddy (talk) 20:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)