User talk:Egmurphyy/sandbox

Author Note
My name is Emily Murphy and I have been working on revising the article about The Amelia Bloomer Project. This article is about an annual list that brings up the best written and illustrated books into the light of young readers, from brith to age 18. The projects goal is to allow young minds to think differently from gender roles that have been placed on genders in todays society, in hope to allow people to think and be who they want to be. I have added some information about Amelia Bloomer whom the project is based off of and why she is such a strong figure in feminism activism. I have also added information on how books get put on this list of books and what kinds of questions the teams think and ask when trying to get the best list of books for the annual project list. I think I have been finding a lot of information that helps readers understand what the list truly is like what criteria the project team is looking for. However, I would like to know from my peers what other information you think I could add to expand the information on the project/list. I was having trouble thinking about more topics and ideas that are still related that could allow a better understanding of The Amelia Bloomer Project. I would love to know what questions come to mind after you read the information I have in my sandbox draft! Thanks! (Egmurphyy (talk) 19:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC))

Candace Peer Response to Emily Murphy
Hi Emily! Reading through everything you have added there's not much I would change. Everything that has been added to the Wikipage is non-biased and fact based. The only thing I would want you to clarify is what age range are these books aimed at? I know they say young girl, but is it strictly a young audience or can older women can read as well? Other than that I no other critiques! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Candacesoto (talk • contribs) 22:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Taylor Johnson Peer Review
First, I love the way that you have organized your content. It was so easy to read because of how you separated your information and I didn't know any of this information so the way it was written kept me interested. I like that you talk about Amelia and her background first before you get into the actual project. The only thing that I saw that is maybe just a mistype was under the "Other Considered Questions" tab. It says insert paragraph and then there is just a numbered list that follows so I think you maybe hit enter too many times or something. Other than that, your content, organization and citing looks really great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcwgswiki (talk • contribs) 16:26, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review Edit from Abigail
You start of with a great introduction in showing the audience what the Amelia Bloomer project is. You could maybe go into depth on what some of those feminist themes are since not everyone might know specifics about feminist academics and it would help give a deeper insight into what the annual book contains. Also there are a few sentences with sources so I would just add a source at the end of those senates to increases the credibility. In the last paragraph I think you could sound more encyclopedic when discussing societies stereotypes and expectations of women. All and all you have a great a topic and base to create your final draft! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbigailBuckingham (talk • contribs) 17:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)