User talk:Ego White Tray/Archive 3

Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_January_6
Hi, I've moved the Church of the Creator discussion there, since it was started on the 6th, not the 5th. &mdash; rybec   06:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia red links
Hello.

In this edit you added some text to Red link without any discussion, however, under WP:BRD this is fine, you were WP:BOLD.

I then reverted your addition. Under WP:BRD my WP:REVERT was also fine, as it says "When reverting, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary and use links if needed" - my edit summary was "Contradicts WP:DDD" which it did, as WP DDD clearly says "Don't add red links that aren't used in any articles"

The next stage of WP:BRD the process is, of course, WP:Discussion, which occurs when the article is back to its pre-bold state

However, you did not discuss, and, despite my having given a reason for my reversion, In this edit, you reverted my reversion; with the edit summary "Reverted good faith edits by Arjayay (talk): Editors are entitled to a justification for reverts for anything that's not obvious vandalism." The implication of this summary is that I had not justified the reason for my revert, whereas the fact that your addition contravened WP:DDD, as explained in my edit summary, is clear justification.

I have, therefore, reinstated the "stable" text, before your edit and look forward to discussing this on the talk page. Arjayay (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

However, as explained, the text you added is not parallel with that at WP:DDD - I need to collect my thoughts on how this could be reworded - or maybe we need to agree exactly what we are trying to achieve, before trying to find the exact words? Arjayay (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * OK - now it's my turn to apologize - I had not seen your apology on Wikipedia talk:Red link - and, as you had misspelled my name, I did not get a notification of this either. (I normally apologize on the editor's talk page).

ANI thread
You may be interested in WP:ANI since you commented in the relevant WT:CSD thread. DES (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

World population articles
Hi, you responded to a post I made at WP:Cities. A discussion is now occurring at regarding the merging of one article into another. Further input would be useful, so please post there if you have any comments to add. Thanks. Eldumpo (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

"Creation is not the same thing as deletion"
I just wanted to say thank you for putting extremely concisely and nicely "creation is not the same as deletion". I wish I could pack so much thought into so few words. It is a very good way to put it. Si Trew (talk) 02:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Guide to abbreviations used in deletion debates
Guide to abbreviations used in deletion debates, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Guide to abbreviations used in deletion debates and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Guide to abbreviations used in deletion debates during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 18:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Halifax, Nova Scotia Hatnote conflict
Hi there - you and I and User:19960401 have been changing around the hatnote on Halifax, Nova Scotia. We should stop wasting each other's time, and discuss it on the talk page. I've started the discussion. I invite you to contribute. AshleyMorton (talk) 13:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Athletes banned for life
Category:Athletes banned for life, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 18:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Seattle Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bascule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of West Seattle Bridge collision


A tag has been placed on West Seattle Bridge collision requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&File_Id=2421. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ...William 01:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Historylink (the source page) is creative commons licensed, and explicitly intended to be shared on other sites. They are listed as a reference, so your nomination is incorrect. Ego White Tray (talk) 01:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I would work with William (signatory above), or independent Users Anne DeLong, or Liz (editors/admins). Take the advice to rewrite: plagiarized text is never good/acceptable, even with original author's permission. Otherwise, RH is unlikely to give you the time that William above did—he expects editors to be born fully formed, technically capable, etc. (or someone else to to the work assisting with such). He also appears to enjoy the process of rapid deletion for some reason, and any expectation of his being involved in a measured analysis of an issue—looking at each matter, case-by-case, and adjudicating on the basis of merit arrived at by attention to history or other detail—is a lost cause.  Fix the article up as best you can, and avoid that admin, my advice.  Le Prof  Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Can do, but I'll need the text back first :( Ego White Tray (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Does behaviour of RHaworth
…in encouraging junior User Launchballer (please skim carefully his User page, ) to reply to queries directed at this Admin, simply odd, or does it rise to a level that it should be discussed at whatever level Administrators are supervised? You guidance kindly appreciated. RSVP here, I will watch. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 01:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't really see a problem with it. It's strange, yes, but not an issue requiring intervention. Haworth's abusive speedy deletes probably do. Ego White Tray (talk) 02:18, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Feel free to let me know if you or others pursue a course of review for the deletions; alone, without the long history of abusive interactions, it perhaps would raise no eyebrows. But the constant denigrations of those who communicate regarding their deletions cannot be standard WP practice for Admins.  By the by, you did look at the junior editor's User page?  I think the matter unseemly, at best. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 02:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I too have commentary about RH regarding a deletion in which he stated he did not understand the rules regarding WP:USERFY. Let me know if this goes anywhere.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612867280 your edit] to Good luck (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * * GoodLuck (band), an electro-swing and dance group from Cape Town, South Africa

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Dipscam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

California State Route 14
Considering that you have already been reverted by 2 people, can you please discuss before readding your template into the article? --Rschen7754 07:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Numerous (mostly unnecessary) RFC's opened by IP. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 02:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

My Alma Mater
So, you're working on a History of Bellingham? I'm a graduate of WWU...I lived there from 1975-1980. Let me know if I can help. WQUlrich (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corps Saxo-Borussia Heidelberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KSCV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

The mad dog of the Middle East listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The mad dog of the Middle East. Since you had some involvement with the The mad dog of the Middle East redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment about difference between superior and superscript letters
Hello. You added "The style is distinct from superscript" in Superior letter article, so could you be so kind to comment on Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 24? Thanks in advance. Ain92 (talk) 13:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Species abbreviation
Template:Species abbreviation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Augurar (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 00:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 04:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Wikipedia:Federal Standard 1037C terms/telecommunications encryption terms listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Federal Standard 1037C terms/telecommunications encryption terms. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Federal Standard 1037C terms/telecommunications encryption terms redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Hypothetical environmental disasters –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 19:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

"Wolfhound" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wolfhound. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Cnilep (talk) 02:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

"I'm sorry Dave" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I%27m_sorry_Dave&redirect=no I'm sorry Dave] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Seychellois legends has been nominated for splitting
Category:Seychellois legends has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)