User talk:Egocentrix

Hi, thanks for your work here. I part-reverted your edit on Penicillin. Please discuss it with me if you have a problem. Also, I notice your edit interests and timing are possibly connected with those of Brainiacal and EtymAesthete. No in-principle problem if they were multiple accounts of the same person, as long as they don't act together in dispute against another editor. But I'm not accusing anyone of anything in saying this—just providing information about the multiple-accounts policy.

My best wishes. Tony  (talk)  08:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry. Do I understand you correctly? Are you saying I'm the same person as Brainiacal and EtymAesthete? (I'm not.) Who are you and why are you accusing me of this, while claiming not to? And if there is nothing wrong with it anyway why are you even bringing it up? Am I supposed to prove I'm not these people somehow? If so, how do I do that? --Egocentrix (talk) 09:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I did go to some lengths to indicate I wasn't accusing anyone. On editorial matters, Graham87 drew my attention to a few issues in your edits; I hope you didn't mind my changes. Tony   (talk)  10:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * OK Tony. I see you undid my edit on Penicillin for no good reason, and Graham87 restored it. What are the other issues? I've got over 6,000 manual article space edits under my belt and a pretty good idea what's expected here, but I'm always open to advice and constructive criticism. Can you please link me to the discussion where Graham mentioned my editing? --Egocentrix (talk) 11:22, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, the MOS allows your cap-after-colon in those circumstances, a point Noetica made to me. Tony   (talk)  13:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You said Graham87 drew your attention to a few issues in my edits. I'd still like to know what those issues are. Can you please link me to the discussion where Graham mentioned my editing, Tony? --Egocentrix (talk) 15:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)