User talk:Eguler

Learning for Life
I see you are adding LFL to the BSA article. LFL is not a BSA membership program. While we do need a short section in the BSA article, the details need to go into Learning for Life, as it is a subsidiary. (I'm guessing you didn't know this article existed). Please add it to the LFL article, but I'm going to revert most of it from the BSA article and create a short section. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 17:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Boy Scouts of America
Expansion of the membership controversies should be done at Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. The section in the BSA article is a copy of the lead-in to the controversies article. The lead-in is a balanced introduction. Any edits in the BSA section will get reverted.

Since these are potentially controversial statements, you should ensure they have have citations or they will get reverted. The controversies article is a good example of a well referenced article. You can also see my How to use footnotes tutorial. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 18:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please- let's not get into an edit war. Changes go in the controversies article, the lead-in gets updated as needed, then the section in the BSA article is updated to match. The lead-in/section has been carefully crafted by folks on both sides of the issue to be balanced according to the Neutral point of view policy. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 21:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree with Gadget850. We have been working for a long time to keep the articles neutral.  Your comments on the controversy could belong in the controversies article if they meet WP:OR standards, including citations, etc. The LFL article could use more information, but the BSA article should not contain more than just a summary of the LFL article.  You should consider adding appropriate information there. --NThurston 21:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see Summary style for the rationale behind this method. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 16:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Scouting
--Gadget850 ( Ed) 13:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

February 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to David Hackworth, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. RJASE1 Talk  18:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)