User talk:Ehsan the 11th

Redacted from Talk:Big Bang
As the boilerplate at the top of that talkpage indicated, it is not a place to discuss your beliefs about how the universe began. There are other sites you can do this, for example. I have therefore placed your message on this page which is a more appropriate venue for discussion of your beliefs. --ScienceApologist 10:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Big Bang........NO SIR!
Many people in the world (almost everyone) believe the Big bang thoery, but you have to question yourself......really? Have you ever considered the other possibilities. I am not against the theory but the thing that is said : 1. Time begun after the Big Bang. And the matter got so densed that it exploded. 2. There was nothing before the bang and if there was.......then it is useless and does not interfere with us.

1. If time begun after the bang, when did the MATTER GOT DENSED? WASN'T IT TIME IN WHICH MATTER BECAME DENSED AND THEN EXPLODED? SUPPOSE THE BANG IS A GERNADE. IF IT IS EXPLODED, THE COVER HAD TO BE OPENED. AND IN BIG BANG'S CASE.........IS THERE NO COVER?

2. The most important thing is the 'thing' that creates another. If we disregard the possibility that something happened before the bang, then we are believing a creation without a creator.

Reply Soon

Ehsan the 11th 09:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Éhsáñ the 11thEhsan the 11th 09:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The end of the first paragraph of Big Bang states that scientists don't know what happened before the Big Bang (or even if "before the Big Bang" is as meaningless as "north of the North Pole".) "Have you ever considered the other possibilities?" That's like asking if we have ever considered Amway, the plight of the hungry, or Jesus Christ. See Talk:Big Bang and its archives. Art LaPella 02:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC)