User talk:Eigdil

Please examine further your discussion of the Clinton Foundation's use of its money. There are many reliable articles in the press that state that only a small percentage (less than twenty percent) of the money in it goes for charitable projects, and the rest stays with the Foundation. The article in Wikipedia seems to equate staying with the Foundation with being put to a charitable use. But keeping the money like that is usually a sign of opaqueness, if not abuse. You mention that one charity monitor gave it an A rating. This is not sufficient scrutiny for such a serious matter. (Eigdil (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC))