User talk:Eingangskontrolle

please give me a notice at de:Benutzer Diskussion:Eingangskontrolle --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 18:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Aroha
Hello Eingangskontrolle, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Aroha - a page you tagged - because: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know.  So Why  16:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from USS Saginaw (LST-1188). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -MBK004 10:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Raphael Hurley at WP:RfD
While on short pages patrol I found a redirect for which you posted a rfd tag but did not list it in the pile of nominations at WP:RfD. I've completed the listing on your behalf, and should you have a reason for wanting the redirect deleted, it might be a good idea to participate in the discussion. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 02:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Adnan Osmani
On 20 March, you tagged Adnan Osmani with rfd, but you did not complete the nomination by listing it at WP:RFD. Can you please complete the second step of the nomination per the instructions at the WP:RFD page? If you do not list it within a reasonable amount of time, I'll assume you no longer wish to see it deleted and will remove the template. Thanks. -- JLaTondre (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

If you would have had a look by yourself - this redirect is misleading. This person is just listed, not described. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

hallo from a new user
--Benutzer:Eingangskontrolle (talk) 07:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Nebmaatre
That's OK. I knew about the sad news already on Nebmaatre. I discussed the news with Udimu on English wikipedia a few weeks ago, also. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Israel Kleiner
Hello. Just to let you know that this page has been tagged for clean-up for these reasons: 2nd entry doesn't have an article and doesn't meet MOS:DABRL; per WP:TWODABS and Template:db-disambig, this should probably be moved back anyway and a hatnote used if helpful.

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

So the EN:WP is missing an important article and needs to hide that fact? --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

No, but adding someone without an article to the WP index of articles (and that's essentially what a disambiguation page is) doesn't help. If you think this person should have an article, you can request it be created (I think that's at Requested articles). I added links to guidelines above, which also show that regardless of whether the article was created, a hatnote is usually recommended when there are only two of this name. I appreciate that you're entitled to your opinion, but as I'd been polite, I was disappointed to see that you'd removed the cleanup tag with a rude comment. I tagged it for cleanup and let you know to give it time, and exposure to experienced editors, so that the article might be created or another way forward found, rather than just deleting something which doesn't meet the guidelines. Seeing my efforts dismissed with a revert and an edit summary of 'nonsense remark' was dispiritng and frustrating. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

In the DE:WP we do it in this way. Its guides readers to the correct articel and avoids the later renaming. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Water High, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lesley Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Minor edits
Please don't mark edits which make any substantial changes to the text as per WP:MINOR. Thanks! a13ean (talk) 23:52, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles A. Kraus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Providence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rocky Mountain High, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification of discussion
A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Interlanguage links
You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

Red rose64 (talk) 14:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Big laugh - there is no language bar if the article had no Interwiki before. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Humboldt_River
Dear E - you said that I introduced Template:218 in the text of Humboldt_River#Watershed_and_Course but I have no idea what this is and cannot find any reference to "Template:218" in the text. Please provide me with more info on what and how I should fix it, thanks.Schmiebel (talk) 9 June 2013 (UTC)

A hydrologic definition instead divides the Humboldt River drainage into two basins - one above and one below Palisade - based on the fact the flows increase above Palisade and decrease below Palisade. The river in the upper basin is 92 mi long and in the lower basin it is 218 mi long.

--Eingangskontrolle (talk) 06:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573941119 your edit] to Rand (surname) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * :Scott Rand

corrected --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Yale's Hartmann astrolabe.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Yale's Hartmann astrolabe.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. INeverCry  18:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion cancellation request
Hi, I'm not sure this is how I am supposed to ask questions on your talk page so please let me know if not. I have checked and changed the article put through for speedy deletion, and I can see that someone changed the first reference on the article to the correct format. Is the article still up for speedy deletion and if so, do you recommend for me to do the same formatting changes to each reference? I want to do what I can for the page not to be deleted if possible. Many thanks for your help. Wikikokoba (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

As fas as i remember, we know the article and you from the DE:WP. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 11:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: MedicAnimal
Hello Eingangskontrolle. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of MedicAnimal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''company appears notable and this is salvageable (just). clean up on the way.''' Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

The German Wikipedia deleted this advertisment and banned the user. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 11:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616944233 your edit] to Ghotour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * {Coord|38.478056|44.768611|display=title|Region:IR}

Redlinks
I agree that Wikipedia:red link states "Red links for subjects that should have articles but do not, are not only acceptable, but needed in the articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject." The subject is not notable and does not have the hope of becoming notable. WP:WTAF based on WP:N. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

I feel that God almighty has written on my talk page. Why is she mentioned at all? --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 15:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I got that same feeling when you wrote, "" when you reverted. Deja vu! That's why I actually listed the guideline.
 * She is listed because she is his wife and BLPs are permitted to list spouses if their names are supported with a reference. See WP:BLPNAME. She has been seen in his company at multiple events promoting his current series.
 * I am very conscious of listing private individuals names and would be the first to remove the names of his spouse and children if it were not supported. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:48, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Montour Run
Seeing as there are no articles for any of the other Montour Runs, and disambiguation pages are only supposed to contain existing articles, I would like to move it my article back to its original title if you do not object. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  21:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

I have objections: There are these 3 other Montour Runs and its a failure of the englishlanguaguge Wikipedia ith they dont have articles for them. Who shall sort out all incoming links when these articles are finally written. Interwikis also suffer badly. Be bold, ignore all stupid rules. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 21:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Where do you get that File:Tempus ad Requiem V by Lorena Kloosterboer.jpg is not 2D ?
Hi User:Eingangskontrolle, despite what it may seem to you the above file DOES correspond to a 2D work of Art, a painting on canvas, as crearly stated in its original description at http://www.art-lorena.com/photorealism/1/3. Please reconsider your speedy deletion request which wrongly states: " its definetely not "oil on canvas"". Thank you. Neuralia (talk) 14:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Please learn the meaning of trompe-l'œil. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Hunt (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Adam Hunt (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 12:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism in high gear. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 07:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anckorn


A tag has been placed on Anckorn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 16:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism in high gear. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 07:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Randykitty (talk) 10:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Günther C. Feigl moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Günther C. Feigl, does not have enough sources and citations laid out in an acceptable format to to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I would especially like to see your article following the style of other encyclopaedia articles here, and not be left for other editors to tidy up for you. So - just for now - I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline (which I suspect it does) and is formatted properly and thus is ready for mainspace, please hit the submit button on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 11:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Günther C. Feigl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Günther C. Feigl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Günther C. Feigl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Bejo Dohmen moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bejo Dohmen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 10:47, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bejo Dohmen
Hello, Eingangskontrolle,

Thanks for creating Bejo Dohmen! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 19:52, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Schindler (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Peter Schindler (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scott Rand (rower)


The article Scott Rand (rower) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unsourced BLP with no evidence of notability. does not pass WP:NOLYMPICS."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mbdfar (talk) 20:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC)