User talk:Einsteinbud

2

Image copyright problem with File:A340alps.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:A340alps.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:A340alps.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A340alps.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - Andrei (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:A350 img.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A350 img.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * This image still lacks a fair use rationale. There is little justification for this image with another fair use image (File:A350xwb.jpg) already being used in the same article. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Democracy Index
I've reverted your changes to Democracy Index. The original data on which the article is based is available here (see pages 4 and 5 for data relevant to the edit you made). Mind matrix  16:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

List of airports capable of accommodating the Airbus A380
Please see Articles for deletion/List of airports that able to offering regular flights by Airbus A380 aircraft. If you believe that the page should be recreated then please use Deletion review. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 18:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * as I pointed out above there was already a discussion that resulted in a deletion of that article, under a different name. If you look at Criteria for speedy deletion (item #4) you can see the reason I deleted it. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The article did exist but under a different name, 12 different names at various times during it's lif span. Please take the time to read the Articles for deletion/List of airports that able to offering regular flights by Airbus A380 aircraft discussion. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * A redirect to what? Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The article was at one time called List of airports that able to offering regular flights by Airbus A380 aircraft, along with 11 or 12 other names as it got moved around. There was a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/List of airports that able to offering regular flights by Airbus A380 aircraft which was closed as a delete. Your article was a recreation of that article but under a new name. I applied Criteria for speedy deletion (item #4) as covering the List of airports capable of accommodating the Airbus A380 and deleted it. If you think that the article should now exist then I please make a post at Deletion review. If you think I have misued my admininstrative tools then please make a post at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you want the material emailed to you or for your sandbox then please let me know. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not making it up. The article did at one time exist under that name but as the Articles for deletion/List of airports that able to offering regular flights by Airbus A380 aircraft shows it was deleted. The article you posted was a recreation of that. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Then please use the links above to follow up. Deletion review and Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Then please take it up at Deletion review. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I have made the deletion review post for you and you can put forward your points at Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I just noticed that you put your comments on the wrong page. I've moved them over to Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 20:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

File:A340alps.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:A340alps.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kyle1278 (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Please DO NOT remove deletion tags from pictures or article until the matter has been solved. Thank you Kyle1278 (talk) 02:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

File:File:A340(Swiss).jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:A340(Swiss).jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kyle1278 (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

File:AvrolinerSWISS.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:AvrolinerSWISS.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kyle1278 (talk) 22:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. --Ericdn (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
DO NOT remove tags from pictures as you did with this and this  if you continue to remove tags or upload copyrighted works from websites you will be blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's Blocking Policy. Thank you Kyle1278 (talk) 01:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Request to move article El Al incomplete
You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page El Al to a different title - however your request is either incomplete or has been contested for being controversial, and has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete will be removed after five days.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:


 * 1) Added    at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article.  This creates the required template for you there.
 * 2) Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding  NewName  to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
 * 3) Added  PageName  to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. Plus two others. 199.125.109.126 (talk) 16:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Brussels Airlines
I have reverted your good faith move of Brussels Airlines to Brussels airlines for two reasons: First, the move was contested by another editor on the talk page. If you believe the move is correct, please list it at Requested moves. Second, you did not use the "move" function to perform the move. Using the move function preserves the page history and talk page of the old page and should be done whenever possible and practical. KuyaBriBri Talk 17:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Recent moves
Hi, I have noticed that several of your recent edits have been page moves or redirects from their existing titles to "official titles" or airports and/or airlines. Please refer to Naming conventions and specifically Naming conventions (companies) for official Wikipedia guidelines on how articles are titled. KuyaBriBri Talk 17:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:AirDC.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AirDC.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KuyaBriBri Talk 18:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:A330Montreal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A330Montreal.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KuyaBriBri Talk 18:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Airport-express-DeDecker.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Airport-express-DeDecker.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KuyaBriBri Talk 18:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:El-Al20logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:El-Al20logo.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KuyaBriBri Talk 18:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Notice of report at WP:AN/I
Your repeated uploading of copyrighted material has been reported to administrators at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You are welcome to comment at the discussion, which is entitled "Repeated copyright violation." KuyaBriBri Talk 19:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

GFDL concerns
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting it into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen.

Since Wikipedia's contributors do not relinquish copyright to text they contribute, but only license it liberally under GFDL, it is important not to separate text from its attribution history. As peculiar as it may sound, doing so can put us in the position of violating our own contributor's copyrights.

Thank you, and please let me know at my talk page if you have any questions about this issue. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Airdc.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Airdc.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Your RfA
It doesn't seem likely to success at this time. I suggest you follow my advice in the oppose section before returning to RfA. In the mean time, would you like to withdraw the request before someone closes it per WP:SNOW? iMatthew : Chat  14:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent RfA
I am sorry, but I have closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you only have 400 edits on Wikipedia; while your edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards by which they judge RfA candidates, this particular RfA was all but assured of not passing.

I am sorry about this, and I hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I am confident that you would be able to submit a successful RfA in the future. You may wish to consider applying for an evaluation by other Wikipedia editors for feedback on how to obtain the necessary experience. Once you are ready to request adminship again, there is a great admin coaching program available, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Aviator006 (talk) 13:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Airdc.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Airdc.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)