User talk:Eirwen29

Historiography and Digital History
Hello Eirwen! To answer your question, I would say that generally, the people who are able to contribute the most to an article are the ones who have the most free time to spend editing here - so, in other words, never the professional scholars. Sometimes that works out well; amateurs can have access to the same sources as professionals, and it is possible for amateurs to produce very good articles here, or a group of amateurs and professionals working together. On the other hand, it also sometimes happens that an amateur is stuck on using one particular source that might be a fringe source, or just completely out of date. Or they have a particular topic that they are hung up on and they distort the sources to emphasize it. (Professionals do this too...just not on Wikipedia...)

I would suggest talking to someone who is much more active than me, and who has created several dozen Good and Featured articles on medieval topics, and who, as far as I am aware, is not a professional historian: User:Ealdgyth. She and the various other people she works with can probably give you a more detailed picture than I can. Good luck! Adam Bishop (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)