User talk:Eitch/Archive

Kilikiti & welcome to Wikipedia
Hi there. Nice work on Kilikiti. Do you think you'd be able to get any public domain photographs of this to include in the article? -- Ian &equiv; talk 23:45, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Contra Dance talk pages
Eitch, Are you knowledgable on how to move parts of a page, with associated history to an archive page? About half of the text on the contra dance talk page could be put into an archive without regret, such as the name change discussion. Obviously not very exciting work, but it would ease future conversations. I'm ignorant of how to do that elegantly and correctly. Yellowdesk 03:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Good idea, and yes I know how. Today's a busy day, but I'll try to get it done. Eitch 16:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Cool. Thanks. No need to hurry, it's been that way for a while. If there's a reference for me to learn how to do that, please let me know (just seems like an admin-level thing to me).Yellowdesk 05:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, finally it's done... I let that take much longer than it should have. For the future, here's the relevant link: How_to_archive_a_talk_page. Oh, And I'm very flattered to be mistaken for an admin! Eitch 23:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yellowdesk 22:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for suggestions on categories. Yellowdesk 00:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Citations to sources for the several contra dance articles.
What I intend to mean is there are many many paragraphs (of very good) text without reference to any published works. As a project, it would be great to get some references to the many claims about what is involved in contra dance. Especially so the articles can be defended from critics saying that the article fails to meet up with Wikipedia standards. And I admit, I could / should be adding references from the books that I have on hand. (Feel free to remove the ugly tag if you desire...and bring the topic to the talk pages...)-- Yellowdesk 00:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The "see also" section: Can I interest you in a drafting couple of eloquent sentences in either the lead, or the history section that incorporate any un-used of the "See Also" links? (except Ted Sannella). I think Social dance and Quadrille is not in the article...perhaps I missed it. I don't mind having the section depart.
 * Links on the "futher reading" section:I don't think there is any harm in multiple links here (linking the author, via the "cite book" template. I suspect most wikipedia reference sections, and bibliographies, will have multiple links of various flavors: publishers, authors, especially. I think Ted Sannella is not mentioned in the body of the article, so it's actually a slim mention, to notice only one link in the "further reading sectioin", if we drop the "see also" section, which I am in favor of. -- Yellowdesk 14:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Amiina
Hi. Was this directed at me? I did note the relevant discussions in my edit summary here. L!nus is proposing the guideline be changed, but seems to now accept that the current guideline is to capitalize such names. --PEJL 17:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry about moving back and forth between your talk page and mine. Shall we stay here?


 * No, actually :) [My (Sept 13) nearly content-free edit to amiina/Amiina] was actually directed at everyone reading the page except you and L!nus (and I've pointed him to this explanation) — you've put forth your views, with evidence, which is good, but it seems  the way to resolve this particular debate will be to reach an explicit consensus. Since we can't take a vote, we can at least encourage people to speak up.


 * In my (Sept 13) edit to the talk page I start with a summary of the debate, because the discussion is so long that people might be discouraged from reading through it. So… I don't mean any offense, but I think it'd be good for us to hold back for a bit. Of course I'm not saying you shouldn't contribute when you feel it's necessary, but let's give people some time to speak up. --Eitch 18:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * (this also counts as a reply to your comment here) again, thanks for your input. there is indeed need of fresh voices, as the current debate has turned into a stalemate with neither party being able to convince the other. it was also the reason why i left the specific case of amiina vs Amiina in favour of the more general debate on the guideline, hoping to draw in other people. --L!nus 20:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Roque
So sorry to have missed your post several years ago requesting input... I too have been very busy, but also discouraged by some practices of certain editors here which has had my activity level be very sporadic. I certainly still believe very much in the project, but don't have the time to waste with certain zealots.

To answer your question while I don't presently play Roque, I did as a child and through my teens and enjoyed it very much. The competitions through the 1960s were quite intense at Chautauqua, Illinois. Doc&#9836; talk 20:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

ListGenBot vs fiddlers
Hiya, you were asking me at one point about using ListGenBot to organise lists of fiddlers. You may like to know ListGenBot has been approved and is running 24/7 so it's free for your use if you want it. Let me know if you'd like assistance with it --Mortice 23:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Awesome - I've put up some comments at User talk:ListGenBot/Enhancements --Eitch 02:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Fiddle category duplication
A tag has been placed on Categor:Fiddlers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

page is all but blank, it's a duplicate entry - Category:Fiddlers already exists

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn bard (talk) 03:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not really a duplicate, but after creating I found Fiddlers by Nationality, and was going to tag it for deletion myself. — eitch 03:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Musician categories
All gone. Glad to see someone else who's interested in categorizing musicians - that's what I spent a lot of time doing last year, before getting bored and turning to other things! Perhaps I ought to start again... Anyway, if you've not seen it, WP:MUSCAT sets out the approach taken so far. Regards, and happy editing. BencherliteTalk 10:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Celtic folk instruments
A tag has been placed on Celtic folk instruments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. PoinDexta1 02:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You certainly are quick! One second later and you would have seen a member in the cat! — eitch 02:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh man, never mind. That's embarrassing - you can tell I was doing this very hastily and feely guilty about breaking my day-long wikibreak: that was supposed to be the category "Celtic folk instruments." It's straightened out now. — eitch 12:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Martie Maguire
Hello! I noticed that you changed Martie Maguire's page. I'm wondering if listing her as a Country Fiddler rather than a Country Musician is right. I feel sort of new to this. She is a multi-instrumentalist. Please let me know. I can always use some help! --leahtwosaints (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Leah, you're absolutely right. I was on a fiddler-categorizing binge, and didn't even realize she played other instruments.
 * The trick with categories, as I see it, is you want to make the categorizations as specific as possible. It isn't always possible, since categories are included in other categories in ways that make it not just a straight-forward hierarchy.
 * In the case of Martie Maguire, it looks to me like she belongs in "American country singers," "American country guitarists," "American country singers" (all of which are in "American country musicians by instrument", "Country-rock musicians," and "Mandolinists". To put the article in these categories, just type
 * Category:The category name, with correct capitization
 * at the bottom of the article. To find other categories you think are relevant, you might try doing a search in "category space" (in the wp searchbox, click "search" instead of "go." from there, check only "category" in the "advanced search" box and search for "country music" or whatever). Definitely ask me any other questions!  — eitch 07:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Please help
Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

your recent edits

 * JS - What edit are you refering to? I'm afraid you have the wrong person. -- Eitch 17:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Sandbox2
The difference between this and Sandbox is that test pages aren't supposed to be in article space. NawlinWiki 02:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh man! That'll teach me to edit when sleep deprived! I didn't even notice I'd done that. Do you have the power to delete pages? Please do it, if so. (p.s. any ideas about what I was actually wondering, namely why the boxes currently at my sandbox and sandbox2 have the differences described at my sandbox?) Geez... I'm glad you caught me. --Eitch 03:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * note I've taken the links off the sandboxes, as they no longer have the relevant content. --Eitch 18:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

TO priority
Yeah, I'm not sure how that got in my user space. I guess you can delete it :) -Judgesurreal777 05:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

User gallery
First off, you failed to sign our post on my talk page. Please make sure to do so by placing four tildes (like this: ~ ) at the end of every comment. As for your suggestion: actually, the great thing about the Internet and Wikipedia is that we aren't running out of server space any time soon. A user subpage with some photos on it does not take up any processing power or disk space at all, practically speaking. We do not delete things on a space issue alone ever on the site. Van Tucky 02:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * First off, I apologize for not signing... and I'm not saying this to start a fight with you (if we could do this in person, I'd be using a friendly tone) but it looks like your talk page has its share of arguments, and you might want to be careful with telling established editors the basics of editing.
 * Anyhoo -- Looking again, I guess the userpage guidelines are not rigid on how much non-encyclopedic content you have in userspace. And whatever, I certainly don't care enough about my interpretation of the guidelines to argue that you should take it down. I was just wondering about your thoughts. — eitch 02:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I didn't realize you've been active lately, I saw the deletion notice just above and thought you were a newbie. My sincerest apologies. As for the gallery, the truth is that I keep my uploads there not as a way to show off (I didn't even take 95% of those photographs, how impressive is a server upload?), but because even if they aren't in use now, I upload images that I think fill a void of subject matter in terms of things needing illustrating. So I keep them there because I want easy access to them, instead of having to go to Commons and hunt one down. Example: the biggest section is sheep photos, which is because I brought Domestic sheep to FA and needed a wide variety of useful images to choose from. Van Tucky 03:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Main page redesign 2008
Hello, ! 2008 main page redesign proposal was recently cleared of all design entries. You may want to re-enter your design(s), based on the details here. (You can see the old list of designs here). NOTE: A survey was conducted on what users wanted to see in the new main page, you can see the results here. Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 01:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * There have been several changes within the 2008 main page redesign proposal, and we are looking froward to you opinion on many of our proposals. ChyranandChloe (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Straw poll
The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll in selecting five proposals before an RFC in which it will be against the current main page. You're input would be appreciated. ChyranandChloe (talk) 04:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Template:Hidden begin
Thanks for your thanks -- your page happened to be among those picked up by AWB and I've been hoping none of them were mangled by the update. So I'm glad to receive good news. Sardanaphalus (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC) PS I've just seen your "teaser" suggestion on Template talk:Hidden begin and have added it to my "to-look-at-someday" list, although I'm not sure if I know enough to implement it.

License tagging for Image:Contra corners-3.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Contra corners-3.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 01:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:FlamingLips Shambolic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FlamingLips Shambolic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:FlamingLips Shambolic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FlamingLips Shambolic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Should be all cleared up now. — eitch 15:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Braineaters-skull logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Braineaters-skull logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * This image is used in a userfied article, temporarily (the article was deleted, and now awaits a second chance). I've deleted the "delete" template, and replaced it with the reasoning. (I've also un-orphaned it, hopefully, by including the userspace article in the "article" field of the non-free use rationale template. — eitch 15:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Seoul (single).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Seoul (single).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Fixed. — eitch 15:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Braineaters-skull logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Braineaters-skull logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mumlogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mumlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The logo was quickly put back in the article by another editor. — eitch 04:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Donner Party (Ultimate)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Donner Party (Ultimate), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

List of fiddlers vandalism?
Your recent edit to List of fiddlers (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mumlogo.png)
 Thanks for uploading File:Mumlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  06:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:BlackTambourineCompleteRecordings.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:BlackTambourineCompleteRecordings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 07:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 15:43, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:17, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:00, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)