User talk:Ejgreen77/Archives/2020/May

Your GA nomination of Khalil Mack
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Khalil Mack you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 08:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khalil Mack
The article Khalil Mack you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Khalil Mack for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jennie Finch
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jennie Finch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 03:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khalil Mack
The article Khalil Mack you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Khalil Mack for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sophie, Princess of Prussia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophie, Princess of Prussia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sophie, Princess of Prussia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 11:08, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

GA nominations
Please refrain from nominating articles for GA if you do not have an interest in addressing comments from a review. There is always a massive backlog at WP:GAN, and reviewers should not have to waste their time writing up comments for nominators who aren't going to fix issues.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  15:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jennie Finch
The article Jennie Finch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. There are changes and clarifications required before this article will meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jennie Finch for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 02:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It seems Ejgreen77 does not have an interest in actually addressing comments from the articles they've nominated for GA. This user has only made 4 total edits to that page, none of which were particularly substantial. I have warned them in a section below about nominating articles for GA that they are not interested in improving.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  15:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. After I picked up the review, I noticed that he had two nominations going, but I didn't realize he was not responding until I was already well into it. I wonder if someone should consider revising the wording at WP:GAN ("Anyone may nominate an article ...") to to more clearly reflect the commitment that it takes. Larry Hockett (Talk) 18:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Reading through the GAN FAQ, it looks like there have been many previous discussions about limiting these types of nominations, and it appears there isn't much that can be done except to provide guidance to nominators and reviewers about this sort of occurrence. Yesterday, I saw that a GA reviewer removed one nomination and quick-failed another on the basis of lack of interest from the nominators (Talk:Frank Gore/GA1, ).  Eagles   24/7  (C)  18:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)