User talk:Ejleroy

December 2018
Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dog breeding have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Championship (dog). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Purebred dog, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Stop spamming that company or breeder's info into articles. And these are not minor edits and we don't use external links that way '' Meters (talk) 03:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

@Meters I am sorry for the spam. It will not happen again. ejleroy

March 2019
Your recent editing history at Puppy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 09:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)