User talk:Ejw1210

Welcome!
Hello, Ejw1210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Steven Weinstein. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm C.Fred. Your recent edit to the page Steven Weinstein appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steven D. Weinstein


The article Steven D. Weinstein has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 03:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven D. Weinstein


A tag has been placed on Steven D. Weinstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have now fixed everything. Thank you.
 * How so? You haven't changed a thing, especially not since I placed the deletion notice. —C.Fred (talk) 03:40, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

There is now a legit reference. Would you please tell me what is wrong and take the speedy delete off
 * What independent reliable source is cited? —C.Fred (talk) 04:41, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Steven D. Weinstein for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven D. Weinstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steven D. Weinstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Ejw1210, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

June 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Steve Weinstein, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 17:28, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steve Weinstein, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Steve Weinstein was changed by Ejw1210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961194 on 2015-06-13T17:29:29+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Steve Weinstein. Optakeover (Talk)  17:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing and refusal to cooperate. Some of the problems, such as your attempts to hijack an article to try to turn it into an article about a different subject, your edit-warring, and your repeatedly messing up the formatting of articles I might have put down to being inexperienced and not understanding how Wikipedia works. However, there are other problems which cannot be so easily seen as good-faith mistakes: for example, your lying about what you are doing by giving deliberately misleading edit summaries, your repeated gratuitous removal of substantial proportions of an article without explanation, your linking to a page about a person with a similar name, but unconnected with the subject of the article, and so on. Many of your edits, including all of your most recent edits, are outright vandalism, and all in all, it is clear that you have no intention whatever of editing collaboratively or constructively. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)