User talk:Ekantik/Archive3

British Indians
I see you are a British Indian.

You might like to read these pages to understand how kind Ian Wilmut is to British Indians. He unlawfully fired the only British Indian senior scientist employed by the BBSRC.

From Daily Telegraph newspaper ( U.K. ) (3 articles) Article 1 Article 2 Article 3

From Guardian newspaper ( U.K. ) (2 articles) Article 1 Article 2 From the Scotsman newspaper (4 articles) Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 4 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.137.57 (talk) 22:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * What does this have to do with the editing of Ian Wilmut? You can't expect me not to edit the article on the basis that Wilmut might be racist towards Indians. Ekantik talk 22:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Funny that's what white people say. They always look for a reason to protect the more powerful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.137.57 (talk) 17:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Please see Uncle Tom —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.137.57 (talk) 00:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Geron Corp possibly scammed? http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/jan2008/petition_wilmut.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.137.57 (talk) 23:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Dear Ekantik,

When was Wilmut knighted? I do not think the investiture has happen yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.137.57 (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

The question is does the Queen make somebody a knight or the BBC? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.137.57 (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I notice you devote pages to Shipla Setty, a very girly and peripheral thing, but seem affronted by the case of a British Indian scientist's plight. You are not open-minded to Dr. Singh's case as you went out of your way to put the might in "might be racist" in italics. Why did you put "might" in italtics? It is the equivalent to the way girls wobble their heads to indicate that they mean the opposite from what they are saying.

You are the one who put a sign indicating that you are British Indian. Is it just some fashion statement? The green and orange and spinning wheel would appeal to the girly minded fashion victims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.96.84.2 (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Bhutto assasin pic
Hello! I noticed the picture you uploaded under a fair use rationale at this article was of poor quality. While pictures uploaded under fair use rationales are supposed to be of low resolution, that copy was so poor you could barely make out the assasins features or the outline of the gun he was holding.

I wanted to update the picture with my own edited version of the same pic. But I somehow ended up duplicating your copy, and because the whole point was to put it on the Bhutto article, I had to orphan your image. I hope you don't mind, and would agree to have your uploaded image deleted for being of poor quality. I retained your comprehensive fair use rationale.

Cheers!

Zaindy87 (talk) 04:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Shilpa Shetty
Hello, as you are one of those who mainly expanded the above-mentioned article, I would like to ask you to reduce the controversy section. I know, you were a major contributor to this article, thus decided to ask you to reduce the section, and not do it for myself. I was willing to reduce this section since long time ago, but now that you're here, maybe you will feel better doing that for yourself.

The main problem of this article is, as said the GA reviewer, undue weight, and the controversy section, especially the mafia links, is amazingly huge. It needs to be cut down and reduced; there is no need to go into minute details.

Also, very long sections of criticism and controversy are frequently tagged with a request for merging and integration into the rest of the text. Please see Words to avoid and Neutral point of view for further information.

Thanks, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  19:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * As for Romanov Vodka, I can't get the reason to mentioning it. Actors endorse numerous products every year. Unless there is some controversy behind it, something that is genuinely notable, a description of her work (it only states that she was chosen) -- it's non-notable. You also can't compare it to PETA and HIV drives, you know.
 * It might also be a good idea to rename 'commitments' to something more descriptive. The term "commitments" could have a pretty wide range of meanings. Regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  19:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi again! I'm sorry, but I disagree with you in that particular case. I have absolutely no problem with mentioning endorsements of actors, as long as they are notable. Launching a new perfume is great and definitely can be mentioned, but Vodka? I can't understand the matter of making a whole section for endorsement for Vodka, when actually nothing regarding her actual work there is mentioned.


 * Well, the Britney Spears article is not a good template for inspiration. It has recently failed an FAC. And even if you want to do the same, remember that while her article presents numerous endorsements, you have a whole section dedicated to only one. Have a look at some FAs and you will see that there are no such mentions. But still, I repeat, I have no problem with endorsements, but there must be some significance to it. As I said above, unless there is some controversy behind it, something that is genuinely notable, a description of her work -- it's non-notable. So this one is clearly non-notable. Launching her own perfume is notable, but an endorsement for some vodka, one of thousands endorsements she may have done, is...


 * A BLP should provide biographical information; a new own perfume is great, and endorsements are great only for one of the above-mentioned reasons, but mentioning one of many endorsements in one section is definitely not an encyclopedic stuff. Have you seen an encyclopedia entry for some actor mentioning something of the sort? PETA and HIV drives are great causes, part of her humanitarian work, therefore very notable, as they constitute a part of her very biography.


 * As for "It is also not a very good practice to remove sourced/referenced information, as it may be done with good intentions but it can also be construed as vandalism." - Just to note, it doesn't apply to established editors who have been working on an article, and although I immesely appreciate your terrific work on this article, I have full right (and equal to yours) to edit this article. We better try to expand her brief career section, rather than adding things to make the article longer. I have expanded her career section, her lead, fought vandalism down the months, and impolite editors on the talk page as well; so I also can remove something which is non-notable. I'm not going to remove it now, I hope you get the matter and do it for yourself. I don't want an edit war. If you still disagree, we'll take it to some noticeboard or a better idea will be to turn to some editors, whom I met on FACs and who constantly vote on FACs, for their opinion. Then it will get clear. In fact, I believe, we both are trying to improve the article.


 * My best regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  09:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Why should I have a problem with endorsements? Yes, I personally wouldn't like such section in an article I mainly work on, because my opinion of what a BLP (actors) should include and what it shouldn't is firm -- Early life-career-other work (including humanitarian work and even endorsements)-personal life (including controversies)-Media lists (including controversies)-and so forth. That's how we'll have a well-written BLP in the full sense of the word - Biography of a living person.


 * Now, if you want a section for her endorsements, so first of all, that's how it should be named - endorsements, not Romanov Vodka, and not only a brief mention of that. It is literally silly to have an entire section only for this Vodka. If you really want a section for endorsements, so it's better to include other endorsements too, many of these she has endorsed, and name it "endorsements" - not Romanov Vodka, which is a little part of thousand products she has endorsed.


 * When I say that I want to consult an editor who regularly votes on FACs, I don't mean that I want to make the article an FA, I mean that I want an opinion of an intelligent editor who knows and understands what the perfect standard for a BLP is. In fact, the article is far from reaching a GA status, let alone FA. I can assure you that if I turn to editors like Sandy, they won't support the existence of a section named Romanov Vodka.


 * Now, Britney Spears, Beyonce, Jessica Simpson, are not good enough to serve us as rolemodels and your points that "other article has that and that, therefore this article should" are not valid, see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. They are full of gossip and data that resembles a gossip magazine at times rather than an encyclopedia. I have always used articles like Jolie, Mariah Carey and other FAs to promote INDICINE articles, but these???

No probs friend, feel free to shift this discussion. Kind regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  22:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello Ekantik!


 * I made some changes from your revision. I know what a good faith edit is, that's why I explained my reversion of the anon's addition. The fact that his edit was not a vandalism doesn't stop me from reverting it, yet assuming good faith. How many scripts can we have on one page? Why specifically Hindi? She speaks nearly ten Indian langs, no? Tulu is her mother tongue, so that's the only version that should be bracketed there.


 * Could you tell me please if you plan to reduce the controversy section? If you don't, please let me know. These mafia and obscenity charges sections etc deserve at most two short paragraphs each. They were never as well publicised as the celebrity big brother contro. Plus, the former (mafia links) is not even related to her directly, and, BTW, was not as famous as the Bharat Shah case for example.


 * I hope you find more time to come in more often. As you know, I had expanded the career section back in time, but it's still too short even when not compared to her other activities. And I repeat, other; she is, first of all, an actress. We have to highlight the fact that she is an actor, a performer; but the article, on the contrary, presents her as a celebrity, a star, a "Celebrity big brother" winner, a famous woman, an activist, which is great but secondary to the most important (and unfortunately, short) film career section. I do agree that CBB contributed much to her status, but for Shilpa, the actress, it's not as important as her acting career (I personally think she deserved every possible award for Phir Milenge. Have you seen the movie?) Do you agree with me regarding that? Do you have some idea how to expand it?


 * My best regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  23:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Dear Ekantik!


 * I know very well what I can and what I cannot revert. I'm a well experienced editor. Vandalism - revert; WP:AGF edit, but still wrong - revert. You have also reverted some of my edits back in time. When I revert good faith edits, I explain my reversion in the edit summary. When I disagree on something, I usually do turn to the talk page, but some things here are just obvious.
 * I repeat, her mother tongue is Tulu, therefore, it's the language which should appear there. If she went now to Germany and lived there for 2 year, would you agree with adding a German script as well? I know it's a silly comparison, but that's it. The fact that she has mostly worked in Hindi cinema is not really valid. Her native tongue, that's what counts. She has also worked in Kannada and Telugu films. So what? Also see Gandhi and Satyajit Ray (FAs), there is only one foreign script for each.
 * Miss Bollywood is a recent event. The lead is here to summarise the article. We still don't know what the reception is, how it benefited her, how it contributed to her success, if that is notable, if that builds her image. It is still on going (and it has nothing to do with the fact that Wikipedia is an ongoing project in that context). Currently, Amitji works in some 10 films or so. So what? What's the problem? We can wait and see the result. According to WP:WBA: "...the first paragraph should be short and to the point, with a clear explanation of what the subject of the page is. The following paragraphs should give a summary of the article. They should provide an overview of the main points the article will make, summarizing the primary reasons the subject matter is interesting..." - is Shilpa (in our particular case) known for Miss Bollywood among others?
 * As for the controversies, you can see the policies and my original message on the very top of this section. I have absolutely no problem with controversies, nor does Wikipedia, but the controversy section is huge, the longest on the page, and should be reduced, as per the above-mentioned reasons. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  07:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * As for the National Film Awards, yeh it was a hard task, I turned to almost every possible administrator. The reason is clear: a veteran, prestigious, and the most prominent award ceremony in India, with a distinguished jury, selected by the government. The award is given by the government itself etc etc. Haven't you seen Phir Milenge? Oh how could you miss the film? You should see it. Shilpa was brilliant! Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  07:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh and great work on WP:INDICINE. I'm not surprised. I know that you're a brilliant editor.:) Great work, I hope to see this project evolving. Best regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  17:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Biblical references abound in Christianity-oriented articles
I agree completely with you but I don't know what to do about it that isn't going to take a lot of effort. You might want to start at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lutheranism, or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity, or Wikipedia talk:Verifiability and post a comment. Your description of the use of biblical verse to "prove the point" in liu of actual citations of secondary sources is, unfortunately, tied up in some Christians reliance on prooftexting in making an argument. They might not get your point at all. Still, the fight would be worthwhile. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Indian lists
Hey friend how are you? Happy New Year!!!

Yes I have done a lot of work on Indian films and lists but predominantly Bollywood which I have split by year. Due the fact that the original Tamil and Telugu list were so incomprehendable I only split them by decade and haven't cleaned them up because I have no knowledge of the films and imdb is very poor for tamil and telugu. I had strongly hoped that somebody from Indian cinema would come along and beautify them like the Bollywood films which I split by year and are now linked in Template:Bollywood. I strongly urge somebody to do the same with Tamil and Telegu films - a detailed guide by year (given the sheer amount of films) and have the Template:Tamilcinema linked with the years in Tamil film at the bottom of every article like bollywood. i'd like to see cleaned up and developed pages like Tamil films of 1972 like Bollywood films of 1972etc. Unfortunately it never seems like anybody except Shahid, Bollywood dreamz and universal hero are consistently active in this group aside from myself, let alone in Tamil or telugu cinema. pLease can somebody clean up the tamil and telegu lists and perhaps from 1950 onwards split by year like Bollywood. Regards  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦      Talk? 15:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Bollywood is in the middle of development. Ideally I want tamil and telugu to have pages like :

♦ Sir Blofeld ♦     Talk? 15:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Yep, glad you agree amigo. Thats why I created around 70 odd locator maps a few days ago for all the countries which don't have maps and will begin adding infoboxes and the locator maps. Its a shame Jimbo can't bring himself to spare me a few words -particularly after all I;ve done for his project. Hope you are well! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦     Talk? 11:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

User Thylacinus cynocephalus
. Yeah, it is not the first time the user has had some more, shall we say, youthful mistakes. before the user changed their username, they had just come off a block for precisely that sort of behavior. He just removed posts to his talk page wthout answering, under the very misguided view that his actions are escaping notice. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  05:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bhutto assasin 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bhutto assasin 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bhutto assassin 1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bhutto assassin 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections
The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 10:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 06:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence
Hello. I'm contacting you and other members of WikiProject Books in order to find if you are interested in collaborating to expand and improve The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence article to make it worthy of becoming a featured article candidate, in light of the fact that it is the first book the U.S. government ever went to court to censor before its publication. --Loremaster (talk) 22:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

DSM-IV Proposal
Would you consider adding any input to our proposal regarding the DSM-IV. Input is being collected on our talk page. Thanks! Mindsite (talk) 22:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Questionnaire
As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron


I notice some of your templates on your user page, and I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever to Wikipedia, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 1 – June 2009
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 11:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 2 – July 2009
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 14:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ekantik! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Vijayachander -
 * 2) Mukul Nag -

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)
This newsletter is automatically delivered by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 18:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Sindhi Wikipedia
Hello,

As a Sindhi speaker, would it be possible for you to join the sindhi wikipedia? It has very few members and little has been translated. Could you please help?

Thanks. --92.11.24.4 (talk) 12:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

& (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bot_requests&oldid=481419438#Message_to_take_part_in_Assessment_Drive request] on Bot requests. 01:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  01:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teri Bahon Mein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Blue Lagoon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanskar TV


A tag has been placed on Sanskar TV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf(talk) 20:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sanskar TV


The article Sanskar TV has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * One of many thousands of TV stations in the world. Totally unsourced. POV removed. We do not have an article for every one of the thousands of stations. They do when they are notable. We need sources for that, which this article does not have, even though it was requested months ago.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 10:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)