User talk:Ekem/Archive-101

Welcome!
Hi Ekem, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 03:39, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Welcome. We can always use another biochemist-type. Or is it a clinical interest? alteripse 05:15, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Reply

 * Well, thanks. I have a clinical interest. It is fascinating to see how the project grows and gets better. A lot of fun, too.

Ekem 18:13, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Wupper
You know, in the picture are explained an old car. Those were used to 1975.
 * Yes, it is the old car, but one of them still runs as Kaiserwagen for special events.Ekem 14:57, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * New picture with contemporary car. Ekem 02:17, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Unwarranted Deletion!!:
Why, pray tell, did an established member of Wikipedia such as yourself delete two DYK submissions in two edits? Since it was in two edits, it shows that it was not a mere accident, but rather a more sinister agenda. Please tell me why? Regards, Spawn Man 22:50, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Please accept my sincerest apologies. I have no agenda other than the shared goal to improve the work, and do not know how I made a mess of it. I am glad to see that it has been corrected. Ekem 02:29, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Apologies accepted... Spawn Man 02:23, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your work on cystic fibrosis
I noticed your restructuring of the cystic fibrosis article and appreciate your input. The Medical Project has been working on bringing it up to featured article status! Several of the changes are less than ideal in that sense, however. Medical articles use an agreed-upon template which is found at WikiProject Clinical medicine/Template for medical conditions. If you would like to discuss the current way that medical articles are constructed, please add your thoughts at the page. Featured articles also typically follow the manual of style, which prefers that headings contain more than one paragraph, etc. I will probably end up changing some of the structural additions that you made, but hope to keep the places where you improved the language, etc. Please let me know what you think! InvictaHOG 03:27, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I saw your note and went ahead and placed the sections back in the original order. The template is nice, but I do agree that some diseases probably work better in a different order! I blended your comments in the different sections to help flow, but I've currently reverted the entire introduction. The introduction strives to summarize the entire article without being to wordy - I think maybe the best one is between our two. I'll give it a closer look later, but think that much of what was excised in your rendition should probably remain, IMHO. InvictaHOG 15:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your comments about the introduction. As I said before, producing a perfect introduction is impossible and there are so many good ways to say the same thing. As for the purpose of the introduction, the style manual at WP:LEAD gives us a nice guide about the commonly accepted role of the introduction. It may not always make sense that the introduction should be a summary of the salient points in an article, but most of the featured articles that I've read/been a part of follow this part of the MoS closely. InvictaHOG 10:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I read the Spanish, French, German, Dutch, and Swedish versions. While I agree that they are nice examples of well-written introductions, they invariably fail to explain critical terminology in a non-scientific manner. Take, for instance, the French use of recessive genetic disease, exocrine glands, epithelium, mutant allele, ATP, etc. all in the first paragraph without any explanation other than wikilinks! Likewise, the German spills into autosomal recessive, chloride channel, exocrine glands without any mention of symptoms. If this were a medical textbook, this might be okay. However, one of the criticisms often brought up in peer review and featured article candidacies for medical articles is the use of jargon and technical terms without explanation. Unfortunately, this often leads to more wordy explanations of key terms and concepts when a single word would otherwise suffice. As for gene mutations - since there are more than a thousand described, listing a few seems to serve little purpose, though you're welcome to add anything that you think is germane! Thanks again for the help. InvictaHOG 18:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wolff.C.F.jpg
Where on the Earth did you find this image? I never saw any images of C. F. Wolff, except for a couple of silhouettes, drawn by some 18th century St Petersburg artist. It is widely believed that these two or three silhouettes are the only images of Wolff survived to date. Could you provide the source? Besides, the dress and hairstyle look a bit anachronistic: Wolff died in 1794, when wigs were still in fashion. The picture looks as if it was taken in the beginning of the 19th century. Alexei Kouprianov 17:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Caesarian Section
I reverted your edit to Caesarian Section, as I found evidence bringing the claim it into question. See the talk page for more info. Chovain 06:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Ryke Geerd Hamer
Dear user Ekem ! You edited article Ryke Geerd Hamer and at the same you itroduced some errors that must be corrected in the future in order to avoid a POV-article.

First of all, hamer is a former physician, now living in spain.

Second: you are talking about an alleged Dirk-Hamer-Syndrome. About this syndrome nothing is know for sure, however. And you wrote: (i cite)...The effect on the brain can be demonstrated by MRI where a specific focal alteration (Hamer's focus, or “Hamerscher Herd”) is apparent....this is not true, even from the POV of hamers supporters because they claim that such a DHS should always be visibile in CT brain scans, but not in any MRI. It is a fact that hamer never tried to prove his CT ring artefacts by comparing them to any MRI scan. I worked (after my study of human medicine) in radiology several years, and i know these ring artefacts very well. I worked also with a Somatom of Siemens. Ring artefacts can occur in older ct scanners if:
 * the calibration procedure at the beginning of operation was not done
 * one or several sensors are not working properly
 * an if in different scans, these rings are seen in different positions

a CT scan showing an alleged DHS can be seen here on a private webpage of a Hamer supporter: http://www.pilhar.com/Hamer/Korrespo/2005/20050808_Beisswenger_GlaubeWissenWeisheit.htm Siemens (manufacturer of the CT scanner Somatom, popular here in Germany over many years, wrote a paper about how to identify ring artefacts. One (out of many) sign is the fact that in ring artefacts you will always see perfect concentring rings. The paper can be seen here: http://www.pilhar.com/Hamer/NeuMed/Zertif/891222og.htm

the CT brain scan shows exactly these concentric ring artefacts. Another page telling us about ring artefacts is this one: http://www.medcyclopaedia.com/library/topics/volume_i/r/ring_artefact/gring_artefact_fig1.aspx?s=ring%20artefact&scope=&mode=1

Michael Redecke 13:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Creating redirects
Redirects are created like "#redirect Uterine malformation". —Centrx→talk &bull; 02:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your changes on Yuanmou Man
Hello!! I think you made the article Yuanmou Man much more in balance. I think you know what you are talking about, so allow me to ask you some questions. I still have some doubts on other dating results of Chinese homonoid fossiles. For the so-called Renzidong man there has been made a Chinese claim of more than two million years, for the Nihewan man 1.5 million years and for the Lantian man 1,6 million years. As a result of these findings Chinese scientists developed the so called Asian hypothesis, claiming an emergence of homonoids in East Asia parallel to an emergence of homonoids in Africa. Do you know this is a mainstream theory or just a China based theory and challenged in the same way as the dates in the Yuanmou Man have been? At the moment I am writing an article on Chinese prehistory on Dutch wikipedia ( so I am looking forward for your answer! Guss2 08:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

THanks for your contributions on PMS page
Dear Ekem; Thank you for your contributions on the PMS page! I liked them very much. The suggestions looks good and made improvements to the page. Are you a doctor? I had a look on the page a couple of weeks ago in order to find out more about PMS and was shocked, because the page then was just crap. So I became a WIkipedia member and gathered some serious information and wrote a new one. :) I am sceptical to the Alternative views section. What do you think about it? There is a girl that insists it to be present. Do you think that PMS could be socially constructed - meaning that women become sick because they think they are supposed to? (See the talk section.) In that case and anyway, that section should be improved by a better presentation... Heidit 18:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments regading my contributions to PMS. Yes, I am a physician. In principle I would leave the alternative section simply because there are differing views on PMS, perhaps more in the non-medical community, so that could be elaborated there. And I agree, in its current form it needs more work. Ekem 21:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Ekem: PRoblem. Someone has made another redirection for "Pms" / "pms", that leads to somewhere else, meaning you have to give it in with all capital letters to get to our PMS page. Could you fix this? I don't know how to do it. Heidit 21:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * done.Ekem 03:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Not completely... Only "PMS" in capitals are redirected to our site now, while "pms" and "Pms" get to somewhere else. Heidit 15:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

OK - maybe it is supposed to, as PMS may be short for several things? So it seems okay now. Heidit 17:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

No, it is not supposed. As our PMS page says, ""PMS" redirects here. For other uses, see PMS (disambiguation)." So when you type in "pms" in small letters, you are supposed to arrive at our PMS page, as this is the most common meaning of "pms". Instead now, you arrive at an empty page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pms. Here the PMS page should have been. Do you think you could fix it - or tell me how to do it? It is enough that our PMS page has a link to the disambiguations page. Best Heidit 21:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC) (suffering with a PMS back ache....)


 * Just let it be. Most users who type in "PMS" will be looking for PMS, so they will get it directly. Users who type in pms may be looking for another lemma, so they go to the disambiguation site, from there they still can go to PMS if that is what they want. Ekem 12:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

TourEgypt
Here is a long discussion on the reasons why touregypt.net linked sites were suddenly banned--without any prior notice--from Wikipedia. Apparently some Admin. named Betacommmand placed it on the blacklist because he thinks it carries too much Ad links. (ie: Spam) Unfortunately, so does most Egypt related web sites but he doesn't seem to care about this inconsistency. Its a painful discussion. It looks like the rest of the world can google and access any Egypt related matter by TourEgypt but Wikipedia users are now banned from accessibng it on Wikipedia. Most TourEgypt stories show up in the Top 10 or 20 list of searches on Google but Betacommand does care about this as he hasn't even bothered to make a response on the discussion here fora t least 2 full days.  Regards, Leoboudv 20:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing this out. I added my comments Some people want to rule instead of improving the articles directly. Ekem 11:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome Ekem. I hope the blacklist on this web site is lifted as the the Wikimedia monitor indicated but prefer to wait a few days before attempt to restore any TE linked web sites. I don't want to be accused--unfairly I might add--of being a spam mer since many of the articles on TE have little interest to me but those that do are of immense value. It is good to know that some Third World child who has access to the Internet can read them. I will, however, take the monitor's instructions into consideration and make sure any TE articles that I may post on Wikipedia have 1)book references and 2)can't be easily sourced elsewhere on the Internet. TE articles which don't contain references would not be considered credible since their information cannot be verified even though I know from the quality of their articles that Jimmy Dunn and his TE team do peform much academic research--on Ancient Egyptian history at least--before they place articles online. Fabian Leoboudv 09:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Dear Ekem, Thanks for your comment on WikiMedia. It was well received by the participants--although I was too busy with work to read it until Friday after the dispute was resolved. The blacklist on TE has indeed been lifted. However, from now on, I will scrutinise any TE linked articles for references first and be more careful in using it. Regards, Leoboudv 08:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * You are welcome. Your point is well taken. We need to make sure that references are less assailable.Ekem 12:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Pathetic indeed
Maybe you could help us find reliable sources to expand the article with instead of just labeling attempts to abide by policy and remove original research as "pathetic"? NeoFreak 01:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Dixi
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dixi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dixi seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dixi, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Help needed
Hi. I was advised over at CLINMED to bring an issue to you. We're having some issues over on Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis about the quality of certain sources (religious, amateur and self-published sources) and issues of interpretation. If you have the time and the inclination, would you mind checking out the discussion on Talk:Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis. The major issues are highlighted in Talk:Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis. It would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Phyesalis 18:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh thank you for taking time to help out! As you can see, I tried to fix the RR section (before it read that all the RRs were significant if they were 1.5 - >1.5!), but I'm no expert. And yes, the article does have some issues that require more in-depth revisions. If you do find some time, I'm sure the article could benefit from a third-party critique. Again, your contribution is greatly appreciated. Phyesalis 01:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Caffeine
Although I assume good faith, the edit you made on caffeine was unnecessary, as the same study by Kaiser is already cited in a more appropriate section, Caffeine, with more specificity and an apparently more direct source.  ~ Xar Bio Geek   (talk) 02:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * How about a self-link to the section on effects during pregnancy? Ex:
 *  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lists caffeine as a "Multiple Purpose Generally Recognized as Safe Food Substance". However, some studies indicate significant toxicity (see "Caffeine intake during pregnancy") 
 *  ~ Xar Bio Geek   (talk) 03:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Done.  ~ Xar Bio Geek   (talk) 03:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I replied to your comment on my talk page. LyrlTalk C 01:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Mona
Regarding this recent edit of yours, as disambiguation pages are only meant for disambiguation, one should not wikilink additional words in an entry unless the main term is a red link as explained in Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). &mdash;Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 04:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Compagnie Internationale des Wagons-Lits
Hello Ekem, I see that about a year ago you were quite actively involved with the Compagnie Internationale des Wagons-Lits article. Last month I did some further work, including relegating the "Carlson" Travel agency references to the footnote they deserve. If you have any further information (or are able to extract it from the French/similar articles) then I'm sure it would benefit further. Just thought I'd let you know! —Sladen (talk) 19:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

SNCFT
This needs something to be done, and seeing it's yours... Cheers,  Basketball one  1  0  04:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This is becoming somewhat of a mockery, with two or three exact same pages... what is going on?  Basketball one  1  0  04:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The two redirects aren't real redirects, or atleast they weren't when I was patrolling.  Basketball one  1  0  04:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Lips to Lips
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lips to Lips, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Lips to Lips.  RT |  Talk  20:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed - sorry  RT |  Talk  20:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Harriet Howard
May I ask what drew you to create an article on this fascinating individual? She is my distant cousin, I was wondering whether you had a connection to her. -- Roleplayer (talk) 03:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately not, it's only a very distant relationship. I do have a photograph of the Chateau she was given and it would be quite legal to upload it to Wikipedia, were it not embedded in a pdf file! -- Roleplayer (talk) 00:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Deutsche Post of the GDR:
I reply where the discussion starts, so look here. ww2censor (talk) 03:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Re
It was not i hit the revert button my accident i reverted the post that i did and restored the information.

Thanks  Staffwaterboy  Talk ♂ 02:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Bombing of Switzerland during WWII
Do you mean de:Ludwigshafen am Rhein or de:Bodman-Ludwigshafen? The former actually lies at the left Rhine river bank while the latter is a small village at Lake Constance. --213.155.224.232 18:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It is Ludwigshafen am Rhein, and you are right it is on the left side. It is a significant distance from Schaffhausen, but see the bombs on Zurich were destined for Aschaffenburg (300 km). Ekem 22:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Uterine cancer
I was actually replacing the stub tag that was already there (a generic medicine one) with a more specific tag (cancer-stub), as I was working my way through cleaning up the medicine stubs category. I have no background in medicine, and was just doing routine maintenance work. If you want to take the tag off altogether, feel free. Dana boomer (talk) 20:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Siege of Mahdia
Can you rename the conclusion section? I think "End of the siege" will be better title than "Conclusion". What do you think?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Spam in TauRx Therapeutics
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on TauRx Therapeutics, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because TauRx Therapeutics is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting TauRx Therapeutics, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Saalburg.jpg
Image:Saalburg.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Saalburg Main Gate (Porta Praetoria).jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * File:13starflag.jpg is now available as Commons:File:13starflag.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm glad you find our project worthwhile! Below is a (generic) project welcome with some handy links. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Invitation
''If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the Medicine Portal. If you are interested in contributing more to medical related articles you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (signup here).'' --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 21:37, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Medicine!
Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!

I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on medicine-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join (regardless of medical qualifications!). Here are some suggested activities:
 * Read our Manual of Style for medical articles
 * Join in editing our collaboration of the week (the current one is )
 * Discuss with other members in the doctor's mess
 * Have a look at some related WikiProjects
 * Have a look at the collaboration dashboard

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on.

Again, welcome! --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Preoperative fasting
Thanks for your contribution to preoperative fasting. I don't suppose you'd have a source for your addition, do you? I've placed a fact tag next to the statement for now. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 20:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Trachelectomy
Hi Ekem,

I'm writing an article on radical vaginal trachelectomy. At your leisure, it would be great if you could pop by to check it out. I'd love to have your input -- since you seem to be a guru on reproduction and gynecology. Nephron T|C 18:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Eclampsia needs work
I posted to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine:"'Eclampsia is still IMHO surprisingly stubby. Can anyone contribute to this? Thanks.'"User:Jfdwolff suggested that I mention this to you. -- 201.53.7.16 (talk) 19:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your work on this article! -- 201.53.7.16 (talk) 03:26, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Gestational diabetes
I've rewritten this article almost single handedly with few other contributions since then. If you have time and feel like it, I'd appreciate a copy-edit and/or comments. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much, and by all means, take your time, there is no deadline. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help today! --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 22:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box (or see ). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 02:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no such button, you just got to re-upload the images into Wikimedia Commons, where every Wikimedia's wikis can use them, please check Moving images to the Commons.--OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 05:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

FYI
Image:17OHPregnenolone.png, which I transferred it to Commons in Aug 07 is up for deletion. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 16:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Bank stuff
Thanks, that's suitably dull :) Haukur (talk) 14:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Your DYK submission
Hello! Your submission at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 23:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I've added another comment and alternate hook. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 06:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

MCOTW
Hi Ekem, hope you're okay. Sorry for my previous cheekiness when I suggested editors approach you with questions about the eclampsia article. As far as I can see you are one of the very few regular contributors with a background in obgyn.

I'm also writing to let you know that premature birth is on WP:MCOTW at present. Your input, especially in the area of indications for tocolysis and preventative procedures (e.g. cervical cerclage), would be much appreciated. JFW | T@lk  00:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing it out to me; it needs some work and I plan to give it some attention during the next weeks.Ekem (talk) 21:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

German post offices abroad
I see you started German post offices abroad but there are no citations in it. If there were, it might be possible to get a DYK from it, but that would need to be done by today to quality for the 5-day period, as you have done previously. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and submitted.Ekem (talk) 03:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

DYK question
Hello! Your submission at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!


 * At the moment, it is unlikely that DYK will post your article to the Main Page. Please take a look at Template_talk:Did_you_know. Thanks. -- Suntag  ☼  16:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

Deletion of Dan Agin
You seem to have been here a while, so you should know the guidelines on Notability and how to cite references. If you create the article in the proper way, it won't get deleted. Deb (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

There is no obligation to inform anyone in advance of the deletion of an article that does not meet the guidelines. If you want me to restore the article, I would need to feel some confidence that you are able to make it meet the guidelines. Otherwise, you could always take it to a deletion review. Deb (talk) 11:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

SS Indigirka
Nice article! A couple of sources which you may be unaware of which you could use to expand the article a bit. Plimsoll Ship Data has copies of Lloyd's Register which give details such as Official Numbers, Code Letters, Tonnage, measurements, operators, builders, etc. The index of entries for Indigirka is here. Miramar Ship Index also has useful info, including a name not mentioned in the article. See the entry for Indigirka. For a suggestion on how to incorporate the additional info see any of the Empire ... ship articles I've created, such as SS Empire Galahad. Mjroots (talk) 07:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * If the ship is still active generally go with current name - unless there was any significant event under a former name or the ship spent a very long time under a former name. Create redirects for all names to article, both with and without prefix, link from disambig pages as necessary. Mjroots (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Just a quick note to say the the Plimsol Ship Data link above has links to the Lloyd's Register entries, just click on the links to see them - the links are in the format of 99z9999. This is where the info I mentioned can be found. Mjroots (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I've redone the infobox, lead and first sections. Looks like you got a bit confused by various (mis)spellings. Redirects created as appropriate to the article. Mjroots (talk) 07:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * You just have to use as many sources as possible to get names, it then becomes quite obvious which are the misspellings. Mjroots (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Feffer and Robeson
Hi, Horwitz cites no sources and when measured against NINE different Robeson biographers, that have all said Robeson expressed not one word on any record publically or private that he felt shame about not helping Feffer. a line like "Robeson felt shame his whole life.." is not credible. Robeson is not Madonna or a vanity Fair pop culture celebrity, his life is meticulously documented. His son Paul Robeson jr is the one whom he told his recollections to. Not Horwowitz. I have kept the section very balanced, please cite sources that actually had real sources. There are plenty of anti-communist references in that section to keep it 'balanced.' Thanks Catherine Hubescher 06:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tiefland.poster.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Tiefland.poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:IRIR.logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:IRIR.logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Cardiology task force
-- MifterBot I (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 20:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC) Maen. K. A. (talk) 23:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

El Cajas
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. (Specifically, it is not a five-fold expansion as required by DYK rules.) Regards, &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 00:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

DYK? Issue
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Carpet Crawler message me  23:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Reuter.Time.Sept.18.1950.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Reuter.Time.Sept.18.1950.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. +Angr 16:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Template filling and Citation BOTs
When adding *cite journal* references as you did in Ovarian cancer, the template filling tool makes it easy if you have a pmid or pmcid and the The Wikipedia citation bot if you have the DOI. The default Template filling values work, but select Add URL. It can be glitchy if the load on the NIH servers is too high. It can do book and web cites too. The Citation BOT or DOI bot is good for a final cleanup after adding cites – it will fill in fields that the template filler may have missed. Hope this is useful. RDBrown (talk) 13:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Looking for help
I am looking for a few editors who would be willing to help me significantly expand the list of dermatologists. Would you consider working on this project? ---kilbad (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

E-mail
Hi,

could you contact me via e-mail (steven_fruitsmaak AT___ hotmailcom)? I have a private message for you (I'm leaving on holiday, so ignore the vacation response).

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 21:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi again,


 * would you mind trying again at an alternative email address that is listed on my wikinews page? http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:Stevenfruitsmaak.


 * thanks, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 08:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Car.conversiontorail.JPG
Did you know that GMC Rail truck was a 1966 GMC? I just thought I'd mention it. DanTD (talk) 15:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
I added a link to the above thread to a section at WT:SHIPS so that people who primarily work on the several very well done ships related articles may weigh in at MOS. Thus, please hold off before adding a guideline to the Manual of Style so the project members have time to respond at your MOS talk thread. Thanks – Sswonk (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Victorian architecture
Hi ! An article you have been concerned with has many  issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Victorian architecture, address the different points if you  can, and leave any  comments there.--Kudpung (talk) 01:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Maternal mortality in fiction
Hi Ekem, I see that you went to some trouble to create Maternal mortality in fiction. I wonder if you could find some sources that talk about the topic; in other words, that are about the subject of maternal mortality in fiction generally? Thanks, Abductive  (reasoning) 08:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Bermuda Maritime Museum
Hi. Can you upload more images of the maritime musuem. They are freely licensed you just have to upload them with the Creative Commons Attribution License. Himalayan   22:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK...Buses in Bermuda
Hello! Your submission of Buses in Bermuda at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! &spades; B.s.n.  &hearts; R.N. contribs 17:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bermuda Maritime Museum
Hello! Your submission of Bermuda Maritime Museum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 11:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Jesús Galíndez
Could you please check Template talk:Did you know and address the sourcing issues? Ucucha 12:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Bioidentical hormone replacement therapy
Hi,

Based on a referral from Jfdwolff, I was hoping you might have an interest in the above article. The sources seems quite clear, but there are long-standing disputes over it. Would you be interested in getting involved? I'll also be asking Alteripse as well, again based on the recommendation from Wolff. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 21:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Opening sentence DYK
Could you please have a look at T:TDYK? The article should get a little more sourcing. Ucucha 15:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Volkstag - Forster
Regarding this edit of yours, I think you are incorrect. This book says he was Gauleiter in Danzig since October 1930 (see esp fn 6), which is supported by this book which unfortunately is not online. For an English source, see here. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:2000px-General_map_of_western_slovenia_svg.png
Thank you for uploading File:2000px-General_map_of_western_slovenia_svg.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Falcon's Lair
Hello! Your submission of Falcon's Lair at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 13:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Tait.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Tait.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Male breast cancer

 * I've modified the citation style in this article (by using citation), and want to ask for you consent now (because WP:CITE says: "If an article already has citations, adopt the method in use or seek consensus before changing it."). --bender235 (talk) 12:03, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, no problem.Ekem (talk) 12:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. --bender235 (talk) 12:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Siege of Mahdia or Mahdian Crusade?
The Siege of Mahdia is, as you say, a part of the Mahdian crusade. As the Mahdian crusade was a true crusade but has no own lemma, wouldn't it be more systematical to move "Siege of Mahdia" to lemma "Mahdian Crusade" and list it among the crusades in lemma "Crusades", where it is not mentioned at the moment? Only a few changes would be necessary in the content of the lemma: The first sentence should be changed in "The Mahdian Crusade was a military expedition in 1390", and the heading "The siege" should be changed in "The siege of Mahdia" --Achsenzeit (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Done. Ekem (talk) 03:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Smellie.W..jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Smellie.W..jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Ekem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Its snowing in East Asia (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Severe weather of the Indian subcontinent during 2010
Fancy helping me out at Severe weather of the Indian subcontinent during 2010.--Its snowing in East Asia (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Navis lusoria
Hello! Your submission of Navis lusoria at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: "To center around"?
Hi,

I'm really sorry for reverting your edit. You are right the proper usage is "on" not "around", and I did not intend to call it vandalism. I was actually trying to rollback two edits by an anon editor before you, somehow your edit got caught in that. I have corrected that line again.

Thanks for pointing that out. Cheers,  S Pat   talk 19:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Prescience
Check what you wrote on Robert G. Edwards talk page back in June 2005... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.211.83.9 (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I am tempted to ask what took them so long. Ekem (talk) 00:33, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Any citation for edits to bedbug?
Regarding this and the edit following -- there is already an entire article on the epidemiology of bedbugs. What you've added isn't wrong, but ... this article has a long and sorry history people adding unsubstantiated claims, and we try to stay on top of that kind of thing. Perhaps you could get a citation or two out of the bedbug epidemiology article and add it? For now, I'll just add tags. Yakushima (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Outdoor recreation
Merge complete. The Transhumanist 04:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Operation Broken Trust
I left a response on the DYK page. I had another look at the article, which is looking better every time. I also searched around a bit more. The LA Times had little to add to Holder's announcement, and neither did the Washington Post, though they had two more editorials one could use to beef up the Reaction section. But the two NYT links I mentioned on the DYK page, this and this, both can help bring independent sourcing to the main section of the article (I don't believe that such reporting is all "criticism"), and that would certainly help broaden the article's authority. I intended for these comments to be helpful, not to be mere criticism. I've asked other editors at DYK to weigh in as well, and if they disagree with me, that's fine. All the best, Drmies (talk) 01:19, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you mind if I run over the article again today to edit (incl. first names, little things like that) the citation templates? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Mozambique Railway
Dear EKEM... seeking information on the performance of Vale in Mozambique, and on the transfer of locomotives EMD DDM45 from Brazil to Mozambique. Would have some information? Meloaraujo (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Regretfully, I would not know. Ekem (talk) 01:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)