User talk:Ekimiheart

Regarding edits to Evolutionary educational psychology
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Ekimiheart! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bebay\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Human nature
Thanks for trying to improve the article on Human nature. Do you know that if you hit the 'show preview' button, you can see a preview of your edits before you save them? It is even possible to check that links work, and then hit the back arrow to return to the page you are editing before you save the page properly. If you are able to improve pages with one edit rather than several edits, it sometimes makes it easier for other people to see exactly what you intended to do to the article. Of course, sometimes it just works best to make multiple edits - so there is no general rule here. Anarchia (talk) 04:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Evolutionary psychology
You are repeatedly inserting the same change to the article Evolutionary psychology after it is being reverted by several ieditors. This is edit warring which is not allowed under our policies. When someone reverts your edit the right thing is to go to the talk page and start a discussion about how to improve the article collaboratively. If you keep reverting you can be blocked from editing. The relevant policies that you should read are: The policy about how we establish consensus, The protocol for how to deal with disagreements and disputes. Also note that if you make more than 3 reverts to the same article in a 24 hr period that is a breach of the Three Revert Rule which may result in your being to be blocked by an administrator. ·Maunus· ƛ · 19:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I have had to report you here for breaching the three revert rule and for failing to engage in constructive discussion.·Maunus· ƛ · 20:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Looie496 (talk) 21:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC) During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Thank you very much for your kind consideration.