User talk:ElKabong

You have been blocked from editing for twenty-four hours for breaking the Three-revert rule. When the block expires, please take your concerns to the article's Talk page rather than reverting the article, and when you do so, stop throwing personal abuse at other editors &mdash; that is also not tolerated (No personal attacks). Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 16:13, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

3RR report
Exactly which part of "Make a copy of the rest of this template above the "Report new violation" header .. Do not edit this copy." was not clear? I'm genuinely curious to know, because people keep doing what you just did - i.e. modify the template, instead of copying it, and modifying the copy. Noel (talk) 18:15, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Please refrain from making Personal Attacks against David Gerard (or anyone else). For example, your third sentence in this edit clearly constitutes a personal attack. Thryduulf 16:25, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Elkabong, if you don't stop your personal attacks, you will undoubtedly be blocked again, and this time permanently. I recommend an entirely different way of interacting. Jayjg (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Regardless of what you believe has happened, you have a simple choice to make; stop making attacks, and continue to contribute to Wikipedia, or continue making attacks, and inevitably be banned from Wikipedia. The decision is yours. Jayjg (talk)  19:18, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * You have to deal with reality; that's the bottom line. Complaining won't help, and will likely make things worse. If you contribute in positive ways, then people will support you.  If you contribute in negative ways, the opposite will happen.  It's not rocket science. Jayjg (talk)  19:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Yet More Personal Attacks
Please don't edit other people's user pages. If you wish to say something, please use their talk page. Thank you. func (talk) 14:35, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

And more
Please don't use edit summaries to make personal attacks, and stop fiddling with other people's evidence. SlimVirgin (talk) 14:46, May 23, 2005 (UTC)


 * First, you and Kain are operated by the same person, so if you say something, he has said it. Second, regardless of how justified your complaint is, you could try expressing it politely. Everyone is tired of your extraordinary rudeness, and it's yet another attribute that indicates you and Kain are the same person. SlimVirgin (talk) 15:34, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Message on user talk:Thryduulf
Firstly, your behaviour and that of KaintheScion are basically identical, and it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt by David Gerard, who the community trusts to have access to the relevant technical information, that you and him/her are the same person. Secondly, making personal attacks against another user on my talk page in a message about directing problems with you to you directly, is a good example of the pot calling the kettle black. Thryduulf 15:53, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Personal attacks
OK, that's enough. As explained in Remove personal attacks, given that personal attacks are not allowed under any circumstances, and given that most of your comments involve personal attacks, the otherwise unusal step of removing or editing your Talk-page comments is now allowed (and, indeed, unavoidable). If a comment is removed, and you feel that your point is important, come back and make it politely. I'm starting with Talk:Islamofascism. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 16:11, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * What, you, the same Admin-abusing jerk who threw around bans to get an advantage at Islamofascism in violation of Wikipedia policy? You're a real head case. ElKabong

3RR
You've been reported for a 3RR violation at Requests for comment/KaintheScion and have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. If you feel this block is unfair, feel free to e-mail me using the link on my user page. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:53, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Unacceptable behavior
A Request for Comments regarding your behavior was opened by me on May 12. Several other users agreed that your pattern of conduct regarding repeated violations of the 3RR, use of sockpuppets, and personal attacks was unacceptable. Since then, you have not substantively changed your behavior in any way. You continue to insert personal attacks into articles and edit summaries (in fact, a perusal of your edits shows few that do not include personal attacks), and to violate the 3RR on a regular basis. This is your final warning. If this behavior continues, I will request that an Arbitration case be opened against you. This can result in remedies up to, and including, a ban from editing Wikipedia. Firebug 17:21, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

User pages
Please don't edit others' user pages. This is considered vandalism. In addition, please treat other editors with civility and respect. I see that you have a number of quarrels with a number of different editors. Disagreements are fine, but the personal attacks you have been making are not acceptable at Wikipedia. I was about to block you for user page vandalism, repeated personal attacks, and violation of the three-revert rule at User:KaintheScion, but it looks like SlimVirgin already blocked you for violation of the three-revert rule at Requests for comment/KaintheScion. Please use this time to cool off; perhaps a day away from Wikipedia will help you approach matters from a fresh perspective. When your block expires, or through e-mail, feel free to contact me if you have any questions. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 17:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

A final appeal
I strongly encourage you to refrain from personal attacks in your edits and edit summaries. Not only do these attacks violate Wikipedia policy, but they turn people away from you, and from supporting your positions. Regardless of how right you think you are, if you continue on this path you will no doubt be permanently banned from Wikipedia, which I assume would be counter-productive to what you are trying to achieve. Time is running short. Jayjg (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't think I'm getting through. You cannot win doing this; adopt a different strategy, the one you are using is not smart. Jayjg (talk)  20:59, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

Dhimmi
Replied on my talk page. &#8212;Charles P. (Mirv) 22:51, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

Please try to relax
Whatever substance or merit your respective edits may have (and of these I am largely unfamilliar), your constant hostility and agression serve to defeat them. You can, and in fact, it is policy that you do engage the material and other editors without personalizing any given dispute. El_C 23:19, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

RFAr
I am opening a request for arbitration against you due to your persistent use of personal attacks and sockpuppets. Firebug 16:34, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

You ought to cut a deal with this guys, and do it very quickly, or this will be the end of your time on Wikipedia. Arbitration is a rigged game: you play, you lose. I don't know whether you care or not, but I just wanted to give you that bit of advice. Everyking 05:03, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Advice
Every childish insult in an edit summary, every personal attack, every violation of Wikipedia policy, makes it more likely that you and all your sock-puppets will be banned. Your sock-puppet Enviroknot is almost getting there, so why not just use that one? Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 12:56, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Incientally, if you're neither KaintheScion nor Enviroknot, why are editing Enviroknot's page, and getting so hysterical about the claim that one is a sockpuppet of the other? Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 12:58, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee case opening
Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al. has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al./Evidence. Thank you. -- sannse (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

block
It's not permitted at this web site to deface pages with profanity, either in regular text or images. If you will agree to adhere to our policies, you may once again be permitted to perform volunteer work here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed Poor (talk • contribs) 18:10, 24 Jun 2005

Arbitration committee decision
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al. &rarr;Raul654 July 2, 2005 02:29 (UTC)