User talk:El Boulboul

Morocco ordered 13 TB2 Bayraktar
Add this to Bayraktar https://mobile.ledesk.ma/2021/04/16/le-maroc-se-dote-dun-escadron-de-drones-armes-turcs-lefficacite-redoutable/

It's done, take a look if you want El Boulboul (talk) 16:08, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Just saw your contribution to the Bayraktar TB2 page with potential sales and Latvia. Although I have not deleted it, I am not sure it is accurate to include every visitor of the BAYKAR as a potential operator. Because there are many other official visits with Memorandum of Understanding agreements. Therefore I believe it's best to stick with only potential operators acknowledged by major news outlets. Happy to discuss further. Cheer!! Omer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omerozkan96 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello and first of all i would like to thank you for your comment, that you like my contribution to the Bayraktar TB2 page.

I think that Latvia should be included as a potential operator because the defense minister on Twitter after he visited the factory even said that hopefully soon his country would get the TB2 so i prefered to add the country on this list.

But yes of course it's better to trust major news outlets to have the certitude of sales of the Tb2 :) El Boulboul (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

So, eventually, someone deleted your contribution. But I am sure there will be articles published by credible news outlets that you can add and re-contribute to the page soon. By doing so I am sure it won't be deleted again. Just adding one of the articles that you may cite in the near future but I am sure you will need more to support it. Cheers!! Omerozkan96 (talk) 03:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Omer

https://www.defenseworld.net/news/29744/Is_Latvia_the_Next_NATO_Nation_to_Order_Bayraktar_TB2_Drones_#.YL7pWC9h1QI

Replaceable fair use File:Construction of the Bridge in September 2021.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Construction of the Bridge in September 2021.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ToprakM &thinsp;✉ 12:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)