User talk:El Heuro

Edit-warring
When somebody reverts your changes in good faith, please don't simply revert their changes. Discuss the disputed edits on the article's talk page, in accordance with BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Simply reverting just leads to edit-wars and may end up involved editors being blocked from editing. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Didn't you just do what you warned me about?


 * Why don't you just discuss it? --AussieLegend (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

We were actually having a discussion about it before you swooped in and made your own decision for us. El Heuro (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Paul Watson
Since you seemed confused, I thought that I should elaborate as to why I reverted your edits. The main problem was this edit. "A theory that Greenpeace itself denies" is not a sentence, it's only a partial sentence. It needed rewording. Paul Watson's claim to be a founding member is a claim, not a theory, so there's an issue there as well. While it's true that we probably don't need a citation, there is a problem with one editor, who insists on sources, but when they are provided he finds another reason to delete the content, which has happened today. On a personal note, I think "He has been credited by The New York Times, the New Yorker and other publications with being a founder of Greenpeace, but Greenpeace denies the claim" adequately combines the edits that Collect and you made, but we have to work around this other editor. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 11:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)