User talk:El Restaurador

=Don't start an edit war== The Falklands are a part of Great Britain and therefore the flag is the current flag. The claim of Argentine is not relevant in this case and has been dealt with in the main article of the Falklands.

Hello, I'm KittenKlub. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to [[2020 coronavirus pandemic in South America]] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.. Do not engage in an edit war KittenKlub (talk) 20:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

I don´t care about the article of the British Overseas Territory, it is another topic at all and I'm not worried at the moment of it because it is the name of the british administration unit as for us the Malvinas are under the Department of the Islands of the South Atlantic wich flag is the one you delated. I remember you that in 1965 94 countries voted positive to recognize a sovereignty dispute. This means that from a neutral point of view like the Wikipedia´s one the Malvinas/Falklands are a part of the UK in the same way they are a part of Argentina. So there are two options, we add the Malvinas infected to the column of Argentina or we add the Tierra del Fuego flag in equality to the overseas territory´s one. You decide KittenKlub --Facu Guti (talk) 20:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Final warning before political-fighting-only block
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Prove it --Facu Guti (talk) 20:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Why are the reasons? Yamla there is no worse blind than the one who doesn´t want to see --Facu Guti (talk) 21:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.